DSpace@İnönü

Evaluation of prostatic artery embolization efficiency in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients withhigh comorbidity

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Yildirim, Ismail Okan
dc.contributor.author Duman, Enes
dc.contributor.author Firat, Ali
dc.contributor.author Celik, Huseyin
dc.contributor.author Sarac, Kaya
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-11T10:47:49Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-11T10:47:49Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Yildirim, IO . Duman, E. Firat, A. Celik, H. Sarac, K . (2018). Evaluation of prostatic artery embolization efficiency in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients withhigh comorbidity. Cilt:17. Sayı:1. 14-17 ss. tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/12530
dc.description.abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy outcomes following prostate artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients with high comorbidity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 22 patients treated with PAE from May 2015 to June 2017. Patients with Charlson comorbidity index >= 2, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >12, prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels <4 ng/mL or between 4 and 10 ng/mL with negative prostate biopsy and total prostate volume (TPV) >90 cm(3) were included. Total PSA, maximum flow rate (Q(max)), TPV, IPSS, post-voiding residual (PVR) values were recorded in all patients in the urology clinic before PAE and at 3 and 6 months after PAE. Results: The average patient age was 73.86 +/- 6.25 years and operative time was 80 minutes (range, 60-120 min). Pre-PAE and 6-month post-PAE values were: IPSS: 25.18 +/- 6.75 an d 11.27 +/- 3.29 (p<0.05), Q(max): 8.31 +/- 3.12 and 17.22 +/- 3.23 (p<0.05), PVR: 87.9 +/- 19.25 and 25.86 +/- 7.72 (p<0.05), TPV: 134.45 +/- 57.56 and 86 +/- 15.4 (p<0.05), and PSA: 3.89 +/- 1.26 and 2.11 +/- 1.06 (p<0.05). Embolization was performed unilaterally due to atherosclerosis and strictures in the internal iliac artery branches in 2 patients. After the procedure, 2 patients experienced transient hematuria which did not require bladder irrigation, 1 patient had acute urinary retention due to dysuria, and 1 patient had transient hematospermia. Conclusion: PAE may be an alternative treatment method in BPH patients with high comorbidity. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Galenos yayıncılık, erkan mor, molla guranı cad 21-1, fındıkzade, ıstanbul 34093, turkey tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.4274/uob.937 tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Urınary-tract symptoms tr_TR
dc.subject mıdterm follow-up tr_TR
dc.subject transurethral resectıon tr_TR
dc.subject trıal tr_TR
dc.subject turp tr_TR
dc.title Evaluation of prostatic artery embolization efficiency in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients withhigh comorbidity tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Uroonkolojı bultenı-bulletın of urooncology tr_TR
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 17 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 1 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 14 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 17 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster