DSpace Repository

Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gozukara-Bag, Harika
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-26T05:50:31Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-26T05:50:31Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Gozukara-Bag, H. (2016). Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials. Cilt:30. Sayı:17. 1880-1890 ss. tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/14289
dc.description.abstract This study evaluated the load-bearing capacity of premolars restored with three types of resin composite materials in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. Extracted human premolars (N=30, n=10 per group) were randomly divided into three groups; MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following resin materials: Group BFC: Bulk-fill composite (SonicFill, Kerr Corporation), Group NC: Nanohybrid resin composite (Filtek Z550, 3M ESPE), Group SC: Silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE). For NC Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) and for SC, Silorane adhesive resin (Filtek Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE) were used. The cavities in NC and SC groups were restored incrementally, while those in BFC groups were restored in bulk. After water storage (24h, 37 degrees C), each tooth was subjected to compressive loading with a stainless steel ball (diameter: 4mm) perpendicular to the occlusal surface (1mm/min). Failure types were categorized according to being repairable or irrepairable. Data were statistically analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test (=0.05). Two-parameter Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) values were calculated. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with BFC (829.84), NC (701.35) and SC (807.73) did not show significant difference (p=0.72). Weibull distribution presented lower shape (0) for SC (m=2.77) and NC (m=3.09) compared to BFC (m=5.01). The incidence of repairable failures was more common in BFC (80%) compared to NC (60%) and SC (50%). Adhesive failures were more often observed in NC (80%) and SC (70%) groups. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Taylor & francıs ltd, 2-4 park square, mılton park, abıngdon or14 4rn, oxon, england tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1080/01694243.2016.1168340 tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Fracture-resıstance tr_TR
dc.subject polymerızatıon shrınkage tr_TR
dc.subject cuspal deflectıon tr_TR
dc.subject composıte tr_TR
dc.subject teeth tr_TR
dc.subject toughness tr_TR
dc.subject performance tr_TR
dc.subject Strength tr_TR
dc.subject behavıor tr_TR
dc.subject amalgam tr_TR
dc.title Load-bearing capacity and failure types of premolars restored with sonic activated bulk-fill-, nano-hybrid and silorane-based resin restorative materials tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Journal of adhesıon scıence and technology tr_TR
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 30 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 17 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 1880 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 1890 tr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record