DSpace Repository

Tool Use in a Psychomotor Task: The Role of Tool and Learner Variables

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author A. JUAREZ-COLLAZO, Norma
dc.contributor.author LUST, Griet
dc.contributor.author ELEN, Jan
dc.contributor.author CLAREBOUT, Geraldine
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-22T07:54:21Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-22T07:54:21Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Juarez-collazo, N. A. , Lust, G. , Elen, J. & Clarebout, G. (2010). Tool Use in a Psychomotor Task: The Role of Tool and Learner Variables . International Journal of Instruction , 4 (2) , . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eiji/issue/5141/70062 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/56846
dc.description.abstract Research on the use of learning tools has brought to light variables that influence the learner on using or not using the tools. A deeper analysis on the current findings is attempted in this study. It adds a psychomotor task; it assesses the actual functionality of the employed tools, and it further explores learner-related variables that influence tool use, most importantly on perceived tool functionality (the beliefs of learners that a certain tool would be the most optimal one). Fiftyeight learners had to build a LEGO® figure. Two tools were used: a video with intentionally low functionality demonstrating the figure assembly, and a step-bystep guideline with pictures. Based on the tools, there were three experimental conditions: guideline (G), video (V) both tools (GV); and one control condition (C) without tools. To analyze the functionality of the tools, the effect of tool use on performance was monitored at two different moments in all conditions. To examine the perceived functionality of tools, the tool use by the learners was monitored in the (GV) condition. Moreover, we checked for the effect of prior knowledge, metacognition and self-efficacy on tool use in the (GV)condition. Results revealed that the tools were functional. The (G), (V) and (GV) conditions significantly outperformed the (C) condition, but contrary to our assumptions, the (V) condition outperformed the other experimental conditions. Regarding perceived functionality, all learners perceived the tools as functional, that means all learners picked a tool. They, however, could not identify from which tool they would benefit the most, i.e. they could not recognize the most functional tool. Concerning the other learner-related variables, no significant effect was found. Theoretical implications for further research are discussed. First on what kind of tool-related variables influence tool use. Second on the effect learner-related variables, especially perceptions, might have on using tools en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Tool Use in a Psychomotor Task: The Role of Tool and Learner Variables en_US
dc.type article en_US
dc.relation.journal International Journal of Instruction en_US
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record