DSpace@İnönü

Comparison of practical application steps of the previously used

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Topal, E
dc.contributor.author Karagol, HIE
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, O
dc.contributor.author Arga, M
dc.contributor.author Koksal, B
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, OO
dc.contributor.author Anil, H
dc.contributor.author Harmanci, K
dc.contributor.author Kutlug, S
dc.contributor.author Ozturk, F
dc.contributor.author Razi, HC
dc.contributor.author Turktas, I
dc.contributor.author Demirsoy, MS
dc.contributor.author Bakirtas, A
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-09T12:04:14Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-09T12:04:14Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/60300
dc.description.abstract Aim: It has been shown by a great number of studies that the correct use of adrenaline auto injectors prescribed to patients with anaphylaxis is associated with the design of the auto injector, in addition to training. The aim of this study was to compare the skills of adults in using two different auto injectors prescribed to patients with anaphylaxis.
dc.description.abstract Material and Methods: Parents of patients aged between 1 and 18 years who referred to allergy outpatients were included in the study.
dc.description.abstract Results: A total of 630 volunteers from nine centers were included in the study. Four hundred fifty-seven (72.5%) of the participants were females and 235 (37.3%) were undergraduates. The rate of showing all the steps of auto injector trainers correctly e by the participants was found as (60.2%) (n=379) for EpiPen and 42.9% (n=270) for Penepin (p<0.001). The most frequent mistake with both auto injector trainers was the step of "place appropriate injection tip into outer thigh/press the trigger so it clicks." When the preferences of the volunteers were asked after training and application, 527 (83.7%) chose EpiPen, stating that it was easier and simpler to use.
dc.description.abstract Conclusions: Our study showed that the correct usage rates of both adrenaline auto injectors were much lower than expected and there could be mistakes in the application of both. It could be appropriate to make improvements in the design of Penepin, which is still the only available adrenaline auto injector in Turkey, such that its application steps will be simpler and quicker.
dc.description.abstract C1 [Topal, Erdem] Inonu Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Malatya, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Karagol, Hacer Ilbilge Ertoy] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Ankara, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Yilmaz, Ozlem] Mersin City Hosp, Dept Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Mersin, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Arga, Mustafa] Medeniyet Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Koksal, Burcu; Yilmaz, Ozlem Ozbek] Baskent Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Ankara, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Anil, Hulya; Harmanci, Koray] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Eskisehir, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Kutlug, Seyhan; Ozturk, Fadil] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Samsun, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Razi, Hasan Cem] Acibadem Hosp, Dept Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Ankara, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Turktas, Ipek; Demirsoy, Mehmet Sadik; Bakirtas, Arzu] Gazi Univ, Sch Med, Div Pediat Allergy & Asthma, Dept Pediat, Ankara, Turkey.
dc.source TURK PEDIATRI ARSIVI-TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS
dc.title Comparison of practical application steps of the previously used
dc.title adrenaline auto injector in Turkey (EpiPen) and the currently available
dc.title adrenaline auto injector (Penepin): a multi-center study


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Dosyalar Boyut Biçim Göster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster