An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue
Başlık:
An observational, prospective, multicenter study on rescue;
high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates failing with;
conventional ventilation
Erdeve, O; Okulu, E; Tunc, G; Celik, Y; Kayacan, U; Cetinkaya, M; Buyukkale, G; Ozkan, H; Koksal, N; Satar, M; Akcali, M; Aygun, C; Ozkiraz, S; Zubarioglu, U; Unal, S; Turgut, H; Mert, K; Gokmen, T; Akcan, B; Atasay, B; Arsan, S; Ozkan, EO; Uslu, S; Demirel, N; Gokce, IK; Vardar, G; Turkmen, M; Konak, M; Ozan, B; Kilicaslan, B; Narli, N; Demir, N; Tuncer, O; Akin, IM; Aslanoglu, S; Calkavur, S; Olukman, O; Bayraktar, BT; Bilgin, L; Guran, O; Aksu, M; Hirfanoglu, I; Ince, DA; Ecevit, AN; Narter, F
Özet:
Background
To achieve gas exchange goals and mitigate lung injury, infants who fail with conventional ventilation (CV) are generally switched to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). Although preferred in many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), research on this type of rescue HFOV has not been reported recently.
Methods
An online registry database for a multicenter, prospective study was set to evaluate factors affecting the response of newborn infants to rescue HFOV treatment. The study population consisted of 372 infants with CV failure after at least 4 hours of treatment in 23 participating NICUs. Patients were grouped according to their final outcome as survived (Group S) or as died or received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (Group D/E). Patients' demographic characteristics and underlying diseases in addition to their ventilator settings, arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis results at 0, 1, 4, and 24 hours, type of device, ventilation duration, and complications were compared between groups.
Results
Tüm öğe kaydını göster