DSpace Repository

Omentopexy versus falciformopexy for peptic ulcer perforation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Olmez, A
dc.contributor.author Cicek, E
dc.contributor.author Aydin, C
dc.contributor.author Kaplan, K
dc.contributor.author Kayaalp, C
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-14T12:32:28Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-14T12:32:28Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/61161
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Open or laparoscopic Graham's omentopexy is frequently used in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). The technical difficulty of applying the omental plug, especially in patients with previous omentum resection, has led to the use of falciform ligament for the PUP, and some studies have reported that PUP may even be a more advantageous technique than omentopexy. Here, in this study, we aimed to compare the retrospective results of patients who underwent falciformopexy or omentopexy for PUP.
dc.source ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA &
dc.title Omentopexy versus falciformopexy for peptic ulcer perforation


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record