DSpace Repository

Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study).

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sahin, M.
dc.contributor.author Hasanoglu, A.
dc.contributor.author Erbilen, M.
dc.contributor.author Orakçi, V.
dc.contributor.author Bülbüloglu, E.
dc.contributor.author Ertaş, E.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-06T09:32:47Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-06T09:32:47Z
dc.date.issued 1995
dc.identifier.issn 02314614 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/62801
dc.description.abstract The prosthetic materials polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene were comparatively studied for postinterventional infection, development of adhesions, and recurrence of hernias and tissue reactions in rats in which abdominal defects 1 by 2 cm in size had been repaired with one of these materials. As regards infection and hernias there was no significant difference vs. a control group of rats. There was no collagen deposition in polytetrafluoroethylene, and the mononuclear inflammatory cell reaction and fibroblastic activity outside the graft layer were steadily less intense with polytetrafluoroethylene than with polypropylene. Adhesions were significantly (p < 0.05) more marked with polypropylene.
dc.source Acta chirurgica Hungarica
dc.title Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study).


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record