Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study).

dc.contributor.author	Sahin, M.
dc.contributor.author	Hasanoglu, A.
dc.contributor.author	Erbilen, M.
dc.contributor.author	Orakçi, V.
dc.contributor.author	Bülbüloglu, E.
dc.contributor.author	Ertaş, E.
dc.date.accessioned	2022-10-06T09:32:47Z
dc.date.available	2022-10-06T09:32:47Z
dc.date.issued	1995
dc.identifier.issn	02314614 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11616/62801
dc.description.abstract	The prosthetic materials polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene were comparatively studied for postinterventional infection, development of adhesions, and recurrence of hernias and tissue reactions in rats in which abdominal defects 1 by 2 cm in size had been repaired with one of these materials. As regards infection and hernias there was no significant difference vs. a control group of rats. There was no collagen deposition in polytetrafluoroethylene, and the mononuclear inflammatory cell reaction and fibroblastic activity outside the graft layer were steadily less intense with polytetrafluoroethylene than with polypropylene. Adhesions were significantly (p < 0.05) more marked with polypropylene.
dc.source	Acta chirurgica Hungarica
dc.title	Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study).

Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Dosyalar	Boyut	Biçim	Göster
Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.