DSpace Repository

Comparison of screening of vesicoureteral reflux with renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrography

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Balbay, M.D.
dc.contributor.author Özsan, Ö.
dc.contributor.author Özbek, E.
dc.contributor.author Özkan, S.
dc.contributor.author Güneş, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-06T09:37:19Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-06T09:37:19Z
dc.date.issued 1998
dc.identifier.issn 03011623 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/62952
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To suggest a different method for diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in lieu of voiding cystourethrography (VCU), in order to prevent radiation exposure. Materials and methods: Fifty-two ureterorenal units of 26 patients were evaluated ultrasonographically for visualizing the renal collecting systems, both before and after filling up the bladder with saline infusion. Every patient also underwent evaluation with VCU. Results: All patients with Grade 2 or higher degrees of VUR on VCU can be identified by ultrasound (USG). Overall sensitivity and specificity of this technique were 66.7% and 93.48%, respectively, in our patient group. Conclusion: After being diagnosed with VCU initially a VUR patient can be effectively followed up by USG in order to prevent radiation exposure. Considering the clinical management of a patient with Grade 1 VUR which could not be detected with USG, it is concluded that failure to detect Grade 1 VUR will not be a handicap.
dc.source International Urology and Nephrology
dc.title Comparison of screening of vesicoureteral reflux with renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrography


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record