DSpace@İnönü

Comparison of nerve vessel and cartilage grafts in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Fırat, Cemal
dc.contributor.author Geyik, Yılmaz
dc.contributor.author Aytekin, Ahmet Hamdi
dc.contributor.author Gül, Mehmet
dc.contributor.author Kamışlı, Suat
dc.contributor.author Yiğitcan, Birgül
dc.contributor.author Özcan, Abdulcemal
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-20T06:24:08Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-20T06:24:08Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Fırat, C. Geyik, Y. Aytekin, A. H. Gül, M. Kamışlı, S. Yiğitcan, B. Özcan, A. (2013). Comparison of nerve vessel and cartilage grafts in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 73(1), 54–61. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 0148-7043
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/6909
dc.description.abstract Abstract: Peripheral nerve injury primarily occurs due to trauma as well as factors such as tumors, inflammatory diseases, congenital deformities, infections, and surgical interventions. The surgical procedure to be performed as treatment depends on the etiology, type of injury, and the anatomic region. The goal of treatment is to minimize loss of function due to motor and sensory nerve loss at the distal part of the injury. Regardless of the cause of the injury, the abnormal nerve regeneration due to incomplete nerve regeneration, optimal treatment of peripheral nerve injuries should provide adequate coaptation of proximal and distal sides without tension, preserving the neurotrophic factors within the repair line. The gold standard for the treatment of nerve defects is the autograft; however, due to denervation of the donor site, scarring, and neuroma formation, many studies have aimed to develop simpler methods, better functional results, and less morbidity. In this study, a defect 1 cm in length was created on the sciatic nerve of rats. The rats were treated with the following procedures: group 1, autograft; group 2, allogeneic aorta graft; group 3, diced cartilage graft in allogeneic aorta graft; and group 4, tubularized cartilage graft in allogeneic aorta graft. Group 5 was the control group. The effects of cartilage tissue in nerve regeneration were evaluated by functional and histomorphological methods. Group 1, for which the repair was performed with an autograft, was evaluated to be the most similar to the control group. There was not a statistically significant difference in myelination and Schwann cell rates between group 2, in which an allogeneic aorta graft was used, and group 3, in which diced cartilage in an allogeneic aorta graft was used. In group 4, myelination and Schwann cell formation were observed; however, they were scattered and irregular, likely due to increased fibrosis. In all of the groups, nerve regeneration at various rates was observed both functionally and histomorphologically. This study demonstrates that cartilage tissue has promoting effects in nerve regeneration. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Annals of plastic surgery tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829fd2be tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Peripheral nerve regeneration tr_TR
dc.subject Cartilage graft tr_TR
dc.subject Nerve graft tr_TR
dc.subject Vessel graft tr_TR
dc.subject Myelination tr_TR
dc.title Comparison of nerve vessel and cartilage grafts in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Annals of plastic surgery tr_TR
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 73 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 1 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 54 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 61 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster