DSpace Repository

Why Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy Failed in HCC. Can the New Immunotherapy Be Expected to Be Better?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dikilitas, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-06T12:43:45Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-06T12:43:45Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.issn 19416628 (ISSN)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/70513
dc.description.abstract Introduction: HCC remains a challenging disease with its unique characteristics and aggressive behavior. Although there are some curative-intent treatments such as liver transplantation and surgical resection, they themselves did not cure the patients with relatively high recurrence rates. Several modalities including local ablation methods like TACE or TARE, systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or antiviral therapies are tested in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, but none of them offered a survival benefit (except antiviral therapy in HBV-related HCC). Conclusion: After a decade of plateau in drug development, ICPIs came into podium with their different mechanism of action consistent with immunogenic nature of the disease and with high expectations, and ongoing trials will show if these agents can satisfy unmet demand in this area. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
dc.source Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
dc.title Why Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy Failed in HCC. Can the New Immunotherapy Be Expected to Be Better?


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record