DSpace@İnönü

Some criteria to attempt second side safely in planned bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Gedik, Ender
dc.contributor.author Güneş, Gülsen
dc.contributor.author Güneş, Ali
dc.contributor.author Uğraş, Murat Y.
dc.contributor.author Yanık, Metin
dc.contributor.author Soylu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Baydinc, Can
dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-26T12:23:22Z
dc.date.available 2017-06-26T12:23:22Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.citation Gedik, E. Güneş, G. Güneş, A. Uğraş, M. Y. Yanık, M. Soylu, A. Baydinc, C. (2008). Some Criteria to Attempt Second Side Safely in Planned Bilateral Simultaneous Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urology, 72(5), 996–1000. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 00904295
dc.identifier.uri http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429508009412
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/7244
dc.description.abstract To determine the validity of some criteria that could guide in the decision to cancel or proceed with the second side of planned bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy (bsPCNL). METHODS Patients with an indication for bilateral PCNL were enrolled in this study. The operation was stopped at the end of the initial side if operative time was 180 min, the hemoglobin level was 11 g/dL, the hemoglobin decrease was 3 g/dL, the systolic arterial pressure was 100 mm Hg, the arterial oxygen saturation was 95%, the arterial blood pH was 7.35, or the blood sodium was 128 mg/mL. The success and complication rates were compared in patients who underwent second side PCNL (group 1) and those for whom the procedure was stopped after the initial side (group 2). RESULTS Of 42 planned bsPCNLs, 12 were stopped after the initial side, with the cause being prolonged operative time in 7, hemoglobin decrease in 6, systolic arterial pressure decrease in 2, arterial oxygen saturation decrease in 2, pH decrease in 1, and sodium decrease in 1. Differences in patient characteristics, stone burdens, and overall success and complication rates were insignificant. Transfusion, postoperative urinary infection, and prolonged urine drainage rates were similar, but the total hospitalization time was significantly longer in group 2. One hydrothorax and one renal pelvic perforation occurred in group 2. The need for transfusion correlated positively with the number of nephrostomy tracts in group 2 (r 0.895, P .001). No such correlation was found in group 1. CONCLUSIONS Despite the best of intentions, about 30% of anticipated bsPCNL cases might be limited to single-sided PCNL, depending on the intraoperative events. Our criteria seem reasonable, because similar success and complication rates were obtained with bilateral, separate-session PCNL and bsPCNL. These criteria can be considered in the decision making to omit the advantages of a single session for safety. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Urology tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.002 tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.title Some criteria to attempt second side safely in planned bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Urology tr_TR
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 113611 tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 72 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 5 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 996 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 1000 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster