DSpace@İnönü

Rapid detection of bloodstream pathogens in liver transplantation patients with film array multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays comparison with conventional methods

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Otlu, Barış
dc.contributor.author Bayındır, Yaşar
dc.contributor.author Özdemir, Fatih
dc.contributor.author İnce, Volkan
dc.contributor.author Çuğlan, Serpil
dc.contributor.author Hopoğlu, Murat
dc.contributor.author Yakupoğulları, Yusuf
dc.contributor.author Kızılkaya, Canan
dc.contributor.author Kuzucu, Çiğdem
dc.contributor.author Işık, Burak
dc.contributor.author Yılmaz, Sezai
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-10T07:49:25Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-10T07:49:25Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Otlu, B. Bayındır, Y. Özdemir, F. İnce, V. Çuğlan, S. Hopoğlu, M. Yakupoğulları, Y. Kızılkaya, C. Kuzucu, Ç. Işık, B. Yılmaz, S. (2015). Rapid Detection of Bloodstream Pathogens in Liver Transplantation Patients With FilmArray Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays Comparison With Conventional Methods. Transplantation Proceedings, 47(6), 1926–1932. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 00411345
dc.identifier.uri http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0041134515005011
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/7353
dc.description.abstract Background. Bloodstream infection (BSI) is an important concern in transplant patients. Early intervention with appropriate antimicrobial therapy is critical to better clinical outcome; however, there is significant delay when conventional identification methods are used. Methods. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the FilmArray BloodCulture Identification Panel, a recently approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay detecting 24 BSI pathogens and 3 resistance genes, in comparison with the performances of conventional identification methods in liver transplant (LT) patients. A total of 52 defined sepsis episodes (signal-positive by blood culture systems) from 45 LT patients were prospectively studied. Results. The FilmArray successfully identified 37 of 39 (94.8%) bacterial and 3 of 3 (100%) yeast pathogens in a total of 42 samples with microbial growth, failing to detect only 2 of 39 (5.1%) bacterial pathogens that were not covered by the test panel. The FilmArray could also detect additional pathogens in 3 samples that had been reported as having monomicrobial growth, and it could detect Acinetobacter baumannii in 2 samples suspected of skin flora contamination. The remaining 8 blood cultures showing a positive signal but yielding no growth were also negative by this assay. Results of MecA, KPC, and VanA/B gene detection were in high accordance. The FilmArray produced results with significantly shorter turnaround times (1.33 versus 36.2, 23.6, and 19.5 h; P < .05) than standard identification methods, Vitek II, and Vitek MS, respectively. Conclusions. This study showed that the FilmArray appeared as a reliable alternative diagnostic method with the potential to mitigate problems with protracted diagnosis of the BSI pathogens in LT patients. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Transplantation Proceedings tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.02.025 tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.title Rapid detection of bloodstream pathogens in liver transplantation patients with film array multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays comparison with conventional methods tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Transplantation Proceedings tr_TR
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 101949 tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 47 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 6 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 1926 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 1932 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster