DSpace@İnönü

Pure transvaginal appendectomy versus traditional laparoscopic appendectomy

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Kayaalp, Cüneyt
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-12T11:25:59Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-12T11:25:59Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Kayaalp, C. (2015). Pure transvaginal appendectomy versus traditional laparoscopic appendectomy. Annals of Surgery. 262 (6); e 109. tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/7757
dc.description.abstract I read with great interest the article by Roberts et al.1 I want to thank the authors and the journal for the first published study that compares transvaginal (TVA) and traditional laparoscopic appendectomies (LA). Their study included 18 patients in TVA and 22 patients in LA groups. They reported that ‘‘mean operative time (TVA: 44.4 4.5 minutes vs LA: 39.8 2.6 minutes, P¼ 0.38) and mean length of hospital stay (TVA: 1.1 0.1 days vs LA: 1.2 0.1 days, P¼ 0.53) were not statistically significant.’’ They also commented that similar operative times could be attributed to the single incision of the TVA, previous single port experience of the surgeon, and the assistance of the gynecologists. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.publisher Annals of Surgery tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000693. tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess tr_TR
dc.title Pure transvaginal appendectomy versus traditional laparoscopic appendectomy tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Annals of Surgery tr_TR
dc.contributor.department İnönü Üniversitesi tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 109262 tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 262 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 6 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage e109 tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster