DSpace Repository

J-pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis after hand-assisted laparoscopic low

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Okkabaz, N
dc.contributor.author Haksal, M
dc.contributor.author Atici, AE
dc.contributor.author Altuntas, YE
dc.contributor.author Gundogan, E
dc.contributor.author Gezen, FC
dc.contributor.author Oncel, M
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-13T10:45:42Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-13T10:45:42Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11616/78168
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To analyze the outcomes of j-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in rectal cancer patients treated with laparoscopic hand-assisted low anterior resection.
dc.description.abstract Methods: Prospective trial on cases randomized to have a colonic j-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis after low anterior resection. Demographics, characteristics of disease and treatment, perioperative results, and functional outcomes and life quality were compared between the groups.
dc.description.abstract Results: Seventy four patients were randomized. Reservoir creation was withdrawn in 17 (23%) patients, mostly related to reach problem (n = 11, 64.7%). Anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher in j-pouch group (8 [27.6%] vs. 0, p = 0.004). Stoma closure could not be achieved in 16 (28.1%) patients. Life quality and functional outcomes, measured 4, 8 and 12 months after the stoma reversal, were similar.
dc.description.abstract Conclusions: Colonic j-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis are similar regarding perioperative measures including operation time, rates of postoperative complications, reoperation and 30-day mortality, and hospitalization period except anastomotic leak rate, which is higher in j-pouch group. Postoperative aspects are not different in patients receiving either technique including functional outcomes and life quality for the first year after stoma closure. In our opinion, both techniques may be preferred during the daily practice while performing laparoscopic surgery; but surgeons may be aware of a possibly higher anastomotic leak rate in case of a j-pouch. (C) 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstract C1 [Okkabaz, Nuri; Haksal, Mustafa; Atici, Ali Emre; Altuntas, Yunus Emre; Gundogan, Ersin; Gezen, Fazli Cem; Oncel, Mustafa] Kartal Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Okkabaz, Nuri] Bagcilar Educ & Res Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Haksal, Mustafa; Gezen, Fazli Cem; Oncel, Mustafa] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Atici, Ali Emre] Marmara Univ, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey.
dc.description.abstract [Gundogan, Ersin] Inonu Univ, Sch Med, Malatya, Turkey.
dc.source INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
dc.title J-pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis after hand-assisted laparoscopic low
dc.title anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective randomized trial on
dc.title short and long term outcomes including life quality and functional
dc.title results


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record