DSpace Repository

Comparison of the results of ultrasonographic evaluation and arthroscopy in patients scheduled for surgery of the supraspinatus tendon rupture

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Görmeli, Cemille
dc.contributor.author Görmeli, Gökay
dc.contributor.author Yücesoy, Cüneyt
dc.contributor.author Ataoğlu, Baybars
dc.contributor.author Kanatlı, Ulunay
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-14T08:18:58Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-14T08:18:58Z
dc.date.issued 2014-11
dc.identifier.citation Gormeli, C., Gormeli, G., Yucesoy, C., Ataoglu, B., Kanatli, U. Comparison of the results of ultrasonographic evaluation and arthroscopy in patients scheduled for surgery of the supraspinatus tendon rupture. (2014). ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 0256-4947
dc.identifier.issn 1319-9226
dc.identifier.other DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.522
dc.identifier.uri http://abakus.inonu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/123456789/16848
dc.description ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE Volume: 34 Issue: 6 Pages: 522-526 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.522 Published: NOV-DEC 2014 Document Type:Article tr_TR
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the findings of the shoulder ultrasonography (US) of patients with a supraspinatus (SS) tendon rupture with those of the shoulder arthroscopy, to determine the reliability and diagnostic performance of the shoulder US in the algorithm of the SS tendon pathologic lesions and their secondary ultrasonographic findings. DESIGN and SETTINGS: A prospective study conducted with patients scheduled for arthroscopy of the shoulder due to an SS tendon rupture in Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Center and Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. MATERIALS and METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for an arthroscopy of the shoulder due to an SS tendon rupture were evaluated by shoulder US 1 week before the surgery. SS tendon pathologic lesions (tendinosis, partial tears, and full-thickness tears) and humeral degeneration were recorded, and the results of shoulder US were compared with those of arthroscopy. RESULTS: With reference to the arthroscopic data, the sensitivity of the ultrasonographic evaluation for the diagnosis of a full-thickness SS tendon rupture was 91%, with a specificity of 88%; the sensitivity for the diagnosis of a partial-thickness rupture was 86%, with a specificity of 82%; and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of a tendinosis was 98%, with a specificity of 71%. With reference to the arthroscopic data, the sensitivity of US for the diagnosis of humeral degeneration was 93%, with a specificity of 91%. CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity and specificity rates of US in detecting SS tendon rupture and its secondary imaging findings make it an efficient and reliable diagnostic modality, which should be preferred to other more expensive and more invasive methods in the algorithm. tr_TR
dc.language.iso en tr_TR
dc.publisher K FAISAL SPEC HOSP RES CENTRE, tr_TR
dc.subject ROTATOR CUFF TEARS tr_TR
dc.subject ASSOCIATION tr_TR
dc.subject ULTRASOUND tr_TR
dc.subject ARTHROGRAPHY tr_TR
dc.subject SONOGRAPHY tr_TR
dc.subject DISORDERS tr_TR
dc.title Comparison of the results of ultrasonographic evaluation and arthroscopy in patients scheduled for surgery of the supraspinatus tendon rupture tr_TR
dc.type Article tr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record