Şenol, DenizÇAVUŞ, FatihÇEVİRGEN, FurkanARPACI, Muhammed FurkanÖZBAĞ, Davut2022-02-152022-02-152021Şenol, D. , Çavuş, F. , Çevirgen, F. , Arpacı, M. F. & Özbağ, D. (2021). MORPHOMETRIC COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT RADIAL HEAD TYPES . İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi , 9 (1) , 19-26 . DOI: 10.33715/inonusaglik.824379https://hdl.handle.net/11616/47174The aim of this study is to determine morphometric measurements difference of radial head (RH) types. 49 dry radial bones were included in the study. After determining the types of radius, morphometric measurements were made with digital calliper. The parameters were determined as the length of radius, height of the radius, transverse diameter of RH, anterior-posterior diameter of RH, radial tuberosity transverse diameter and height, length and transverse diameter of ulnar notch. As the result of RH classification, it has been determined that; 20 bones had irregular, 15 bones had oval and 14 bones had round type. In order to on all group average; radius length of RH, the height of RH, transverse diameter of RH, anteroposterior diameter of RH were calculated as 207.99±21.97 mm, 9.45±1.68 mm, 19.94±3.15 mm, 20.20±3.09 mm respectively. In order to on all group aver-age; transverse diameter of radial tuberosity, height of radial tuberosity, the height of ulnar notch, transverse diameter of ulnar notch were 12.07±1.3 mm, 25.36±2.78 mm, 13.86±1.56 mm, 5.27±0.8 mm respectively. Ac-cording to the results of One Way Anova analysis, no statistically significant difference was found between RH types (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between RH types in all parameters.trinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArticle