Simsek, NeslihanKeles, AliAhmetoglu, FuatOcak, Mevlut SinanYologlu, Saim2024-08-042024-08-0420141807-3107https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vo128.0006https://hdl.handle.net/11616/102649The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two retreatment techniques, in terms of the operating time and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results, in removing three different root canal sealers from root canals that were previously filled with gutta-percha. Sixty extracted single-rooted human premolars were divided into three groups and filled with iRoot SP, MM Seal, and AH Plus sealers, along with gutta-percha, through a lateral compaction technique. Root canal fillings of the samples were removed by ESI ultrasonic tips or R-Endo files. The time to reach the working length was recorded. Longitudinally sectioned samples were examined under SEM magnification. Each picture was evaluated in terms of the residual debris. Data were statistically analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis test. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of operating time (p>0.05). Significant differences in the number of debris-free dentinal tubules were found among the root canal thirds, but this finding was not influenced by the experimental group (p<0.05). Resin sealer tags were observed inside the dentinal tubules in the MM Seal group. Under the conditions of this study, it may be established that there was no difference among the sealers and retreatment techniques.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessEndodonticsRetreatmentMicroscopyElectronScanningArticle2821151212487867210.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vo128.0006WOS:000341898100005Q3