Celikoglu, MevlutBuyuk, Suleyman K.Sekerci, Ahmet E.Ersoz, MustafaCelik, SalihSisman, Yildiray2024-08-042024-08-0420140889-54061097-6752https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.005https://hdl.handle.net/11616/96584Introduction: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the facial soft-tissue thicknesses and craniofacial morphologies of patients affected by bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and to compare the findings with a well-matched control group without any clefts using cone-beam computed tomography. Methods: The study sample consisted of 40 retrospectively and randomly selected patients divided into 2 groups: a BCLP group (20 patients; mean age, 13.78 +/- 3.20 years) and an age-and sex-matched control group without clefts (20 patients; mean age, 13.94 +/- 2.52 years). Craniofacial and facial soft-tissue thickness measurements were made with cone-beam computed tomography. The Student t test and multiple linear regression analyses were performed for the statistical evaluations. Results: The BCLP group had an increased SN-MP angle (P = 0.003), a decreased Co-A (P = 0.000), and retruded maxillary (P = 0.000) and mandibular (P = 0.026) incisors. In addition, patients affected by BCLP had statistically significantly decreased thickness measurements for the variables subnasale (P = 0.005) and labrale superior (P = 0.026) compared with the controls. The most predictive variables were found at U1-SN (r = 0.417, P = 0.004), IMPA (r = 0.368, P = 0.010), and ANB (r = -0.297, P = 0.031) for subnasale and U1-SN (r = 0.284, P = 0.038) for labrale superior. Conclusions: The BCLP group showed greater vertical growth, greater retrusion of the maxilla and the maxillary and mandibular incisors, and decreased subnasale and labrale superior thicknesses compared with the well-matched controls without clefts. These differences should be taken into account when planning orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment for those patients.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessPharyngeal Airway VolumeAdolescent PatientsCraniofacial MorphologyProfile ChangesPrevalenceAsymmetryGrowthArticle14655735782543920710.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.0052-s2.0-84908376164Q1WOS:000344624600017Q2