Yazar "Alkara, Utku" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Effect of Complex Venous Outflow Drainage Reconstruction on Postoperative Graft Function in Right-Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    (Mdpi, 2025) Kilercik, Hakan; Akbulut, Sami; Elsarawy, Ahmed; Aktas, Sema; Alkara, Utku; Sevmis, Sinasi
    Background: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the predominant transplantation technique in regions with low rates of deceased donation. Right-lobe grafting is adopted in most clinical and radiological donor/recipient scenarios. Due to the considerable variations in right-lobe hepatic venous anatomy, many techniques have been used over the years for the purpose of appropriate venous outflow reconstruction during the recipient procedure. In this paper, we present the technical details and consequences of a complex venous outflow reconstruction model (CORM) based on experience, and the long-term patency results obtained using the model. Methods: Data of patients with end-stage liver disease who underwent LDLT between 21 December 2017 and 29 November 2022 were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The nomenclature of CORM was assigned when three or more hepatic vein anastomoses were performed. Patients with CORM (CORM group; n = 69) were compared with non-CORM patients (non-CORM group; n = 130) in terms of demographic, pre- and postoperative clinical, and follow-up features. Results: Sixty-nine recipients had three or more separate outflow reconstructions (RHV, RIHV, and one or more anterior sectoral veins); these constituted the CORM group. The estimated graft volume of the CORM group was significantly lower than that of the non-CORM group (833 vs. 898; p = 0.022), and the mean GRWR was also significantly lower (1.1 vs. 1.2; p = 0.004). CORM cases showed longer anhepatic phases, as well as longer times for cold and warm ischemia, than non-CORM cases (63 vs. 51 min, 46 vs. 38 min, and 48 vs. 33 min, p < 0.001), though no difference was found with respect to total operative duration. There were no statistical differences between the two groups with respect to rates of in-hospital re-exploration, length of ICU stay, or length of total hospital stay. Graft survival rates at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 88.1%, 83.3%, and 83.3%, respectively, in the CORM group, and 82.9%, 80.2%, and 70.6%, respectively, in the non-CORM group (p = 0.167). Conclusions: Performing three or more CORMs in right-lobe LDLT is not associated with inferior outcomes, either with regard to perioperative variables or to patient and graft outcomes. Right-lobe graft with complex venous anatomy from a living donor should not be a determinant factor for donor exclusion.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Effect of Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems on Short-Term Outcomes after Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    (Mdpi, 2024) Kilercik, Hakan; Akbulut, Sami; Aktas, Sema; Alkara, Utku; Sevmis, Sinasi
    Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effects of the pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method hemodynamic monitoring systems on short-term graft and patient outcomes during living donor liver transplantation in adult patients. Materials and Methods: Overall, 163 adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2018 and March 2022 and met the study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on the hemodynamic monitoring systems used during surgery: the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method group (n = 73) and the pulse index continuous cardiac output group (n = 90). The groups were compared with respect to preoperative clinicodemographic features (age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score), intraoperative clinical characteristics, and postoperative biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and platelet count). Results: There were no significant between-group differences with respect to recipient age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, Child, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, surgery time, anhepatic phase, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, erythrocyte suspension use, human albumin use, crystalloid use, urine output, hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. However, there was a significant difference in fresh frozen plasma use (p < 0.001) and platelet use (p = 0.037). Conclusions: The clinical and biochemical outcomes are not significantly different between pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method as hemodynamic monitoring systems in living donor liver transplantation. However, the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method is more economical and minimally invasive.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Factors Affecting Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Requirements during Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    (Mdpi, 2024) Kilercik, Hakan; Akbulut, Sami; Elsarawy, Ahmed; Aktas, Sema; Alkara, Utku; Sevmis, Sinasi
    Background: Intraoperative blood transfusion (IOBT) during liver transplantation (LT) has negative outcomes, and it has been shown that an increasing number of these procedures may no longer require IOBT. Regarding living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the literature on the pre-transplant predictors of IOBT is quite heterogeneous and deficient. In this study, we reviewed our experience of IOBT among a homogenous cohort of adult right-lobe LDLTs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on adult LDLT recipients between January 2018 and October 2023. Two groups were constructed (No-IOBT vs. IOBT) for the exploration of pre- and intraoperative predictors of IOBT using univariate and multivariate analyses. An ROC curve analysis was applied to identify possible cut-offs. The one-year post-LDLT overall survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 219 adult LDLT recipients were enrolled. The No-IOBT (n = 56) patients were mostly males (p = 0.016), with higher preoperative levels of HGB (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p = 0.005), and albumin (p = 0.007) and a lower incidence of pre-transplant upper abdominal surgery (p = 0.017), portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.04), hepatorenal syndrome (p = 0.015), and ascites (p = 0.02) than the IOBT group (n = 163). The No-IOBT group had a shorter anhepatic phase (p = 0.002) and received fewer intravenous crystalloids (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the pre-transplant HGB (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p < 0.001), and albumin (p = 0.04) levels were independent predictors of IOBT, showing the following cut-offs in the ROC curve analysis: HGB <= 11.5 (AUC: 0.800, p < 0.001), fibrinogen <= 125 (AUC: 0.638, p = 0.0024), and albumin <= 3.6 (AUC: 0.663, p = 0.0002). These were significantly associated with the No-IOBT group. The one-year overall survival of the No-IOBT and IOBT groups was 100% and 83%, respectively (p = 0.007). Conclusions: IOBT during LDLT is associated with inferior outcomes. The increased need of IOBT during LT can be predicted by evaluating serum levels of hemoglobin, albumin and fibrinogen before liver transplantation.