Yazar "Candiri, Büşra" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Conservative, interventional and regenerative methods in chronic pain management
    (2020) Candiri, Büşra; Talu, Burcu
    Abstract: Pain is a complex condition that affects an individual physically, mentally and socially and in which clinicians find it difficult to cope. In particular, the impact of chronic pain on patients’ lives can range from small restrictions to complete loss of independence. Therefore, there are many applications for improving the quality of life of individual and controlling the pain. In recent years, a better understanding of the physiological and chemical mechanisms involved in chronic pain has gained pain management many new treatment methods. These are starting from non-invasive treatment methods such as physiotherapy, manual therapy, emotional therapy, and progressing to more invasive methods such as spinal cord stimulation and deep brain stimulation. Although current advances have taken effective steps in chronic pain control, more comprehensive research is needed on the effectiveness of these treatments and in which situations they are used in coping with pain. In this review, we aimed to summarize current conservative and interventional multidisciplinary methods and special treatment methods used in chronic pain management and to guide clinicians in cope with pain.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Pandemic process status questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties
    (2023) Candiri, Büşra; Talu, Burcu
    The pandemic process has caused significant changes in many areas of daily life. The aim is to develop a new questionnaire to evaluate the changes that occurred during the pandemic process and to examine the psychometric properties of this questionnaire. For face validity, 10 individuals were asked to interpret the questions. The Pandemic Process Status Questionnaire was tested with the help of a questionnaire created with the help of Google Forms. In order to evaluate the content validity, the content validity index and content validity ratio were used in line with the opinions of 7 experts. A pilot test was carried out. Exploratory factor analysis was performed for construct validity. The World Health Organization Quality of Life-brief version was used for convergence validity. A total of 25 items with an impact score of less than 1.5 in face validity were deleted. According to the content validity index, 15 items and 21 items according to the content validity rate were removed. In the pilot application, 5 items with an item-total correlation below 0.3 were deleted. The results of the exploratory factor analysis provided 6 dimensions: general status, physical status, psychological status, social and economic status, concerns about the pandemic, and eating habits. This structure explained 71.77% of the total variance. The questionnaire showed a weak correlation with the World Health Organization quality of life-Short Form (r=0.26). The Pandemic Process Status Questionnaire is a short and valid tool to summarize the situation encountered during the pandemic process.