Yazar "Denizhan Y." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Clinical and radiologic results of surgically-treated acetabular fractures
    (2003) Elmali N.; Ertem K.; Inan M.; Ayan I.; Denizhan Y.
    OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the functional and radiologic results of surgical treatment in patients with displaced acetabular fractures. METHODS: The study included 21 patients (13 males, 8 females; mean age 35 years; range 21 to 63 years). Before surgery, all the patients were evaluated with anteroposterior, iliac, and obturator oblique views and computed tomography scans. According to the Letournel-Judet classification, the fractures were simple in 10 patients and complex in 11 patients. Twelve patients had posterior wall and/or the posterior column fractures. Four patients underwent closed reduction under emergency settings for accompanying posterior dislocations. The mean time to surgery was 4.8 days (range 1 to 13 days). Surgery was performed by the Kocher-Langenbeck approach (n=12), a triradiate approach (n=5), and a modified extended iliofemoral approach (n=4). Functional results were assessed by the D'Aubigne-Postel's knee scoring system and radiologic results using anteroposterior, iliac, and obturator oblique views. The mean follow-up was 31 months (range 19 to 64 months). RESULTS: Functional results were excellent in eight patients (38.1%), good in seven (33.3%), satisfactory in four (19.1%), and poor in two patients (9.5%). Radiologic examination showed posttraumatic arthrosis in four patients (19.1%), heterotopic ossification in three patients (14.3%), and avascular necrosis in two patients (9.5%). Radiologic results were excellent and good in 16 patients (76.2%), satisfactory in three patients (14.3%), and poor in two patients (9.5%). CONCLUSION: Clinical and radiologic results showed concordance. The presence of dislocations and inadequate reduction were associated with poor functional results.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Comparison of the pull-out strengths of three different screws in pedicular screw revisions: a biomechanical study
    (2006) Esenkaya I.; Denizhan Y.; Kaygusuz M.A.; Yetmez M.; Keleştemur M.H.
    OBJECTIVES: We investigated the possible effects of three pedicular screws on axial pull-out strength in pedicular revision surgery. METHODS: Two study groups were formed from calf lumbar vertebrae. Initially, Alici pedicular screws with an outer diameter of 6.5 mm were applied (with or without tapping) to all the pedicles. All the pedicles were subjected to axial pull-out testing to induce pedicular insufficiency. Then, Alici pedicular screws with an outer diameter of 7 mm were applied to the left pedicles. The right pedicles in the two study groups were assigned to receive two different types of pedicular screws with an expandable (enlargeable) end, respectively. Axial pull-out testing was repeated in both groups and the results were compared with the initial pull-out strength values. RESULTS: In the first group, 65% and 64% of the initial pull-out strengths were obtained with 7-mm Alici pedicular screws and with expandable pedicular screws, for the left and right pedicles, respectively. The corresponding pull-out strengths in the other study group were 70% and 68.5% of the initial values, respectively. Tapping of the screw hole entrance resulted in a mean decrease of 13% in the pull-out strength compared to screw applications without tapping. CONCLUSION: Pedicular screw revisions using a 0.5 mm greater screw in diameter did not provide adequate screw-bone inter-face strength and pedicle filling. Similarly, expandable pedicular screws did not contribute to screw stability.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    The effect of injury level, associated injuries, the type of nerve repair, and age on the prognosis of patients with median and ulnar nerve injuries
    (2005) Ertem K.; Denizhan Y.; Yologlu S.; Bora A.
    OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the functional results of nerve repair (median and/or ulnar) in patients with forearm clean-cut injuries and investigated the effect of injury level, associated injuries, the type of repair (primary or secondary), and age on the prognosis. METHODS: The study included 42 patients (34 males, 8 females; mean age 31 years; range 9 to 62 years) who were treated for forearm clean-cut injuries. Involvement was in the proximal forearm in four, mid-forearm in 11, and distal forearm in 27 cases. There were 51 nerve injuries affecting the median nerve (n=30) and the ulnar nerve (n=21). Nerve injuries were isolated in 12 patients, associated with tendon injuries in nine patients, and with tendon and artery injuries in 21 patients. The patients were evaluated in four age groups including 0-15, 16-30, 31-45 years, and 46 years or above. Functional evaluations were made using the Seddon classification. The effect of injury level, associated injuries, the type of repair, and age on the prognosis was assessed. The mean follow-up was 39 months (range 11 to 57 months). RESULTS: Although the clinical and functional results of primary and late-primary repairs were less favorable than those of secondary repairs, the difference did not reach a significant level (p>0.05). The injury level, associated injuries, and age did not influence the Seddon scores significantly (p>0.05). In the age group of 0-15 years, the results were very good in all the patients (100%), but good and very good results accounted for only 20% in the age group of 46 years or above. CONCLUSION: In appropriate cases with clean-cut nerve injuries, primary repair must be the first choice. Taking the low regeneration capacity into consideration, priority should be given to reconstructive procedures in patients at older ages.