Yazar "Geredeli, Caglayan" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 8 / 8
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Efficacy and safety profile of COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients: a prospective, multicenter cohort study(Future Medicine Ltd, 2022) Yasin, Ayse Irem; Aydin, Sabin Goktas; Sumbul, Bilge; Koral, Lokman; Simsek, Melih; Geredeli, Caglayan; Ozturk, AkinAim: To compare the seropositivity rate of cancer patients with non-cancer controls after inactive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (CoronaVac) and evaluate the factors affecting seropositivity. Method: Spike IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured in blood samples of 776 cancer patients and 715 non-cancer volunteers. An IgG level >= 50 AU/ml is accepted as seropositive. Results: The seropositivity rate was 85.2% in the patient group and 97.5% in the control group. The seropositivity rate and antibody levels were significantly lower in the patient group (p < 0.001). Age and chemotherapy were associated with lower seropositivity in cancer patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlighted the efficacy and safety of the inactivated vaccine in cancer patients. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov) Plain language summary Cancer patients are at high risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2 and of developing the associated disease, COVID-19, which therefore puts them in the priority group for vaccination. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CoronaVac, an inactivated virus vaccine, in cancer patients. The immune response rate, defined as seropositivity, was 85.2% in the cancer patient group and 97.5% in the control group. The levels of antibodies, which are blood markers of immune response to the vaccine, were also significantly lower in the patient group, especially in those older than 60 years and receiving chemotherapy. These results highlight the importance of determining the effective vaccine type and dose in cancer patients to protect them from COVID-19 without disrupting their cancer treatment.Öğe Efficacy and safety results of pemetrexed administration in non-small cell lung cancers, a multicenter study of the Association of Anatolian Medical Oncology.(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013) Yasar, Nurgul; Unal, Olcun Umit; Geredeli, Caglayan; Inal, Ali; Berk, Veli; Sari, Ebru; Durnali, Ayse[Abstract Not Available]Öğe EGFR-targeted treatments in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Experience of panitumumab.(Amer Soc Clinical Oncology, 2017) Gumus, Mahmut; Geredeli, Caglayan; Ucar, Mahmut; Kaya, Serap; Demir, Hacer; Unal, Olcun Umit; Degirmenci, Mustafa[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Is eribulin treatment prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with this drug? Retrospective analysis of a multicentre study(Imprimatur Publications, 2019) Oruc, Zeynep; Kaplan, Muhammet Ali; Geredeli, Caglayan; Sari, Nilgun Yildirim; Ozaslan, Ersin; Aytekin, Aydin; Elkiran, Emin TamerPurpose: This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors for survival and the reliability and the effectiveness of eribulin therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients treated with eribulin in 12 medical oncology centers in Turkey between 2013-2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen potential prognostic variables were assessed for analysis. Results: The patients had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens and a median of 3 eribulin cycles for MBC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% Cl: 4.1-7.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95 % Cl: 6-15). Multivariate analysis showed that eribulin treatment line was shown to have independent prognostic significance for PFS. PFS difference was demostrated in patients who received 3 chemotherapy lines for advanced disease compared to those who had more than 3 chemotherapy lines [median PFS; 3 lines: 8.6 months (6.2-11) and >3 lines: 4.6 months (3.7-4.6) p=0.00]. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 52.5 and 35% in patients treated with three lines and with >3 previous chemotherapeutic regimens. Most common toxicities were neutropenia (62.5%), fatigue (52.5%), alopecia (50%) and nausea (37.5%). Conclusions: Eribulin treatment line was identified as indepedent prognostic factor for PFS in MBC patients.Öğe Is lymph node ratio prognostic factor for survival in elderly patients with node positive breast cancer? The Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology(Edizioni Luigi Pozzi, 2013) Inal, Ali; Akman, Tulay; Yaman, Sebnem; Ozturk, Selcuk Cemil; Geredeli, Caglayan; Bilici, Mehmet; Inanc, MevludeSeveral studies have now demonstrated that the lymph node ratio (LNR), as a superior indicator of axillary tumor burden to the number of excised nodes. While, about the prognostic value of LNR on the the survival of elderly patients is limited. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluate the prognostic value of lymph node ratio in elderly patients with node positive breast cancer. METHODS: Onehundredeightyfour patient with operable breast cancer, recruited from 17 institutions, were enrolled into the retrospectively study. Eleven potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. RESULT: Among the eleven variables of univariate analysis, four variables were identified to have prognostic significance for Overall survival (OS): pathologic tumor size (T), No. of positive nodes (N), LNR and estrogen receptor-positive (ER). Among the eleven variables of univariate analysis, two variables were identified to have prognostic significance for Disease-free survival (DFS): N and LNR. Multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard model showed that 7; LNR and ER were considered independent prognostic factors for OS. Furthermore, LNR was considered independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the LNR was associated with the prognostic importance for DFS and OS in elderly patients who were administered adjuvant treatments.Öğe Pathologic and Clinical Characteristics of Elderly Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of a Multicenter Study (Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology)(Int College Of Surgeons, 2014) Inal, Ali; Akman, Tulay; Yaman, Sebnem; Ozturk, Selcuk Cemil; Geredeli, Caglayan; Bilici, Mehmet; Inanc, MevludeThere is very little information about breast cancer characteristics, treatment choices, and survival among elderly patients. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to examine the clinical, pathologic, and biologic characteristics of 620 breast cancer patients age 70 years or older. Between June 1991 and May 2012, 620 patients with breast cancer, recruited from 16 institutions, were enrolled in the retrospective study. Patients had smaller tumors at diagnosis; only 15% of patients had tumors larger than 5 cm. The number of patients who had no axillary lymph node involvement was 203 (32.7%). Ninety-three patients (15.0%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Patients were characterized by a higher fraction of pure lobular carcinomas (75.3%). The tumors of the elderly patients were also more frequently estrogen receptor (ER) positive (75.2%) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive (67.3%). The local and systemic therapies for breast cancer differed according to age. An association between age and overall survival has not been demonstrated in elderly patients with breast cancer. In conclusion, the biologic behavior of older patients with breast cancer differs from younger patients, and older patients receive different treatments.Öğe Real-world treatment outcomes from nationwide Onco-colon Turkey registry in RAS wild-type patients treated with biologics second-line mCRC.(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2022) Yildirim, Mahmut Emre; Karaca, Mustafa; Artac, Mehmet; Cicin, Irfan; Geredeli, Caglayan; Alacacioglu, Ahmet; Simsek, Eda Tanrikulu[Abstract Not Available]Öğe What are the differences between young (25 years) and adults (>25 years) colorectal cancer (CRC)? An Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology Study.(Amer Soc Clinical Oncology, 2015) Kaplan, Muhammet Ali; Urakci, Zuhat; Gumus, Mahmut; Arslan, Ulku Yalcintas; Geredeli, Caglayan; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Koca, Dogan[Abstract Not Available]
