Yazar "Karasin, Ibrahim Baran" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Failure of a Code-Compliant Reinforced Concrete Building: Damage Patterns and Nonlinear Seismic Response(Mdpi, 2026) Onat, Onur; Karasin, Ibrahim Baran; Yon, Burak; Varolgunes, Sadik; Oncu, Mehmet Emin; Uslu, AliThis study investigates the seismic performance limitations of a newly constructed reinforced concrete building that collapsed during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmara & scedil;-Elbistan earthquake despite formal compliance with current seismic design requirements. Beyond the specific earthquake event, the study addresses a broader scientific problem: the limited understanding of the relationship between observed damage mechanisms and nonlinear dynamic response in mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings. The first part classifies recurring structural and non-structural damage patterns identified in newly constructed RC residences. The second part presents a nonlinear fiber-based static and dynamic analysis of a collapsed mid-rise building. Nonlinear dynamic analyses were conducted using ground motion records scaled to match the site-specific elastic design spectrum defined by TBDY 2018, corresponding to predefined seismic performance levels rather than an incremental dynamic analysis framework. The results indicate that an extremely low shear wall-to-floor area ratio (0.0357%) combined with asymmetric vertical element distribution significantly amplified torsional response and local shear demands. Nonlinear dynamic analyses showed that critical shear walls exceeded Collapse Prevention limits under DD2-level excitation, while system-level shear contribution limits remained within code-defined thresholds. Dynamic base shear demand corresponded to approximately 30% of the maximum nonlinear capacity obtained from pushover analysis, indicating that localized member failure rather than global strength deficiency governed the collapse mechanism. The analytically identified critical members were consistent with the observed collapse configuration, particularly at the soft ground story. The findings demonstrate that prescriptive code compliance alone may not ensure satisfactory seismic performance when structural irregularities, torsional amplification, and detailing deficiencies coexist. The results are consistent with damage patterns reported in other recent destructive earthquakes and contribute to improving the understanding of collapse mechanisms in code-compliant RC buildings.Öğe Seismic Resistance and Performance Evaluation of Masonry Dwellings After the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Sequence in Türkiye(World Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltd, 2024) Onat, Onur; Yon, Burak; Uslu, Ali; Oncu, Mehmet Emin; Varolgunes, Sadik; Karasin, Ibrahim Baran; Gor, MesutOn February 6, 2023, two catastrophic earthquakes occurred on the East Anatolian Fault. The earthquakes had magnitudes of Mw = 7.7 and 7.6 and struck Kahramanmara & scedil;-Pazarc & imath;k and Kahramanmara & scedil;-Elbistan, respectively. The Kahramanmara & scedil;-Pazarc & imath;k earthquake was triggered at 04:17 local time on the Dead Sea Fault (a branch of the East Anatolian Fault). The last earthquake on the addressed fault occurred about 500 years ago. The recorded peak ground acceleration (PGA) at the Pazarc & imath;k station reached 2.05g. In addition, the Pazarc & imath;k earthquake triggered two independent earthquakes, the Nurda & gbreve;& imath; and Islahiye earthquakes, which occurred 10 min later than the Pazarc & imath;k earthquake. However, the last earthquake, with its epicenter in Kahramanmara & scedil;-Elbistan, struck at 13:24 local time. The recorded PGA for the Elbistan earthquake is 0.68g. This study aims to present the fault rupture mechanism of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmara & scedil; earthquakes, earthquake characteristics, and to evaluate the performance of masonry dwellings during the Kahramanmara & scedil; earthquake doublet, which affected 10 provinces and numerous towns and villages. This paper also aims to illustrate the damage and failure mechanisms of the masonry dwellings, despite unexpectedly high accelerations that exceeded the design spectrum in the field, specifically in Kahramanmara & scedil;, Gaziantep, Hatay, and Malatya, according to the current earthquake code in use.











