Arşiv logosu
  • Türkçe
  • English
  • Giriş
    Yeni kullanıcı mısınız? Kayıt için tıklayın. Şifrenizi mi unuttunuz?
Arşiv logosu
  • Koleksiyonlar
  • Sistem İçeriği
  • Analiz
  • Talep/Soru
  • Türkçe
  • English
  • Giriş
    Yeni kullanıcı mısınız? Kayıt için tıklayın. Şifrenizi mi unuttunuz?
  1. Ana Sayfa
  2. Yazara Göre Listele

Yazar "Uslu, M. O." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    An assessment of periodontal health in patients with schizophrenia and taking antipsychotic medication
    (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013) Eltas, A.; Kartalci, S.; Eltas, S. D.; Dundar, S.; Uslu, M. O.
    Background and objective: Severe periodontal disease is prevalent among patients with schizophrenia and is caused by the side effect of their medication, poor dental hygiene and smoking. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the rate of periodontal disease could be modulated by changing the salivary flow rate (SFR) because of the use of antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Group A (n=33) included patients who used medications that may cause xerostomia, or dry mouth and Group B (n=20) included patients who used medications that may cause sialorrhea, an excessive secretion of saliva. The participants' periodontal status was assessed using the plaque index (PI), assessing bleeding on probing (BoP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL). Results: The mean of PI and BoP was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (P<0.001), but the PPD, CAL and decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) scores were not significantly different in the two groups according to the statistical results (0.05). Conclusions: The researcher concluded that there is a high risk of periodontal disease among patients with schizophrenia, and there is an even higher risk of periodontal disease induced by medication that increased SFR. Preventive dental protocol should be increased during the dental health care of this disadvantaged patient group.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Do genetic polymorphisms affect susceptibility to periodontal disease A literature review
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019) Toy, V. E.; Uslu, M. O.
    The pathogenesis of periodontal disease is not solely based on microbial dental plaque but is the result of the multifactorial and complex interaction between infection and host response. Many studies in the literature have demonstrated the differences between individuals in terms of host immune response and the presence of genetic components in numerous pathological conditions. Therefore, periodontitis may be defined as a complex genetic disorder with a phenotype formed by the genetic structure and environmental factors in the affected individual. So, determination of the genetic susceptibility profile associated with periodontitis might be very precious for developing novel diagnostic techniques and individual treatment strategies. To clarify the possible role of genetic polymorphisms in periodontal diseases, we searched PubMed for studies published on the subject since 1997 up to June 2018 and obtained data from original studies, meta analyzes, and systematic reviews. We included only caseucontrol studies with large study populations.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Evaluation of long-term dental implant success and marginal bone loss in postmenopausal women
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020) Toy, V. E.; Uslu, M. O.
    Aim: The aim of this study was to examine long-term implant success and marginal bone loss (MBL) of dental implants in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Materials and Methods: Postmenopausal women who underwent dental implant treatment at least 3 years ago were divided into two study groups [Test (osteoporosis/osteopenia) Group and Control Group] according to bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Besides clinical periodontal and radiographic examinations, any implant failures were also recorded. Results: A total of 52 patients with a mean age of 59.51 +/- 5.66 years (Test Group; 26 patients, mean age: 60.61; Control Group; 26 patients, mean age: 58.42) were included in the study. Implant survival rates were 96.2% and 100% with a mean follow-up 60.84 +/- 22.13 and 60.07 +/- 20.93 months in Test and Control Groups, respectively (P > 0.05). While peri-implant PI (plaque index) and PD (probing depth) were not different between the groups, BoP (bleeding on probing) was significantly higher in Test Group (P = 0,026). Although MBL in Test Group was higher than Control Group (0.82 +/- 0,63 mm and 0.44 +/- 0,33 mm respectively), the difference was not found statistically significant (P = 0.069). Conclusion: Within the limits of this retrospective study, it can be concluded that postmenopausal osteoporosis/osteopenia does not affect MBL and long-term implant success. The findings suggest that dental implant therapy is a reliable treatment modality in these patients to improve the quality of life by increasing function and aesthetics.

| İnönü Üniversitesi | Kütüphane | Rehber | OAI-PMH |

Bu site Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile korunmaktadır.


İnönü Üniversitesi, Battalgazi, Malatya, TÜRKİYE
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz lütfen bize bildirin

DSpace 7.6.1, Powered by İdeal DSpace

DSpace yazılımı telif hakkı © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Çerez Ayarları
  • Gizlilik Politikası
  • Son Kullanıcı Sözleşmesi
  • Geri Bildirim