Yazar "Yavuz, Dilek" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Delays in diagnosis in patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis
    (2019) Acarturk Tuncay, Eylem; Yalcinsoy, Murat; Gungor, Sinem; Selcuk, Engin Burak; Tokgoz Akyil, Fatma; Yavuz, Dilek; Sucu, Pakize; Alpaslan Bekir, Sumeyye; Ocakli, Birsen; Aksoy, Emine
    Aim: Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic disease with typical or atypical pulmonary and extra-pulmonary symptoms or frequently without symptoms. Presence of typical clinical findings and symptoms contribute to rapid diagnosis, whereas asymptomatic progression leads to delays in the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the delay in diagnosis in between patients with pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary involvement and related symptoms and those without symptoms. Material and Methods: Patients in the sarcoidosis clinics between 2010-2015, were retrospectively evaluated. The cases were grouped according to the presence or absence of symptoms (pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary). The groups were compared with regard to the delay in diagnosis. Results: Among the 300 patients, 209 (69%) were female. The mean age was 43±11.68. The disease was stage I in 67.3%, stage II in 23.7%, stage III in 5.7% and stage 0 in 3.3% of the patients. No significant difference was observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with regard to total duration until diagnosis (p=0.78). A statistically significant difference was observed between patients groups with regard to physician-related delayed diagnosis(p=0.026). The mean delay in physician-related diagnosis was observed to be longer in asymptomatic cases (21.44 days) compared to patients with pulmonary symptoms (13.66 days)(p=0.036). In asymptomatic cases, the mean duration of physician-related delayed diagnosis (21.44 days) was observed to be longer in comparison with patients with extra-pulmonary symptoms (12.79 days)(p=0.016). In patient-related delayed diagnosis, no difference was observed between groups with regard to the duration until diagnosis(p=0.78). Conclusion: Comparison of delayed diagnosis between patients with or without pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary symptoms revealed a longer duration of delay in asymptomatic cases compared to symptomatic cases. The timing of diagnosis is very important in sarcoidosis in order to reduce morbidity and mortality; a suspicious approach to asymptomatic patients will increase the possibility of diagnosis and prevent delayed diagnosis.Keywords: Sarcoidosis; diagnosis; delay; extrapulmonary symptoms.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Delays in diagnosis in patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis
    (2019) Tuncay Acarturk, Eylem; Yalcinsoy, Murat; Gungor, Sinem; Selcuk, Engin Burak; Tokgoz Akyil, Fatma; Yavuz, Dilek; Sucu, Pakize; Alpaslan Bekir, Sumeyye; Ocaklı, Birsen; Aksoy, Emine
    Abstract: Aim: Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic disease with typical or atypical pulmonary and extra-pulmonary symptoms or frequently withoutsymptoms. Presence of typical clinical findings and symptoms contribute to rapid diagnosis, whereas asymptomatic progressionleads to delays in the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the delay in diagnosis in between patients with pulmonaryand/or extra-pulmonary involvement and related symptoms and those without symptoms.Material and Methods: Patients in the sarcoidosis clinics between 2010-2015, were retrospectively evaluated. The cases weregrouped according to the presence or absence of symptoms (pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary). The groups were compared withregard to the delay in diagnosis.Results: Among the 300 patients, 209 (69%) were female. The mean age was 43±11.68. The disease was stage I in 67.3%, stage IIin 23.7%, stage III in 5.7% and stage 0 in 3.3% of the patients. No significant difference was observed between symptomatic andasymptomatic patients with regard to total duration until diagnosis (p=0.78). A statistically significant difference was observedbetween patients groups with regard to physician-related delayed diagnosis(p=0.026). The mean delay in physician-relateddiagnosis was observed to be longer in asymptomatic cases (21.44 days) compared to patients with pulmonary symptoms (13.66days)(p=0.036). In asymptomatic cases, the mean duration of physician-related delayed diagnosis (21.44 days) was observed to belonger in comparison with patients with extra-pulmonary symptoms (12.79 days)(p=0.016). In patient-related delayed diagnosis, nodifference was observed between groups with regard to the duration until diagnosis(p=0.78).Conclusion: Comparison of delayed diagnosis between patients with or without pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary symptomsrevealed a longer duration of delay in asymptomatic cases compared to symptomatic cases. The timing of diagnosis is veryimportant in sarcoidosis in order to reduce morbidity and mortality; a suspicious approach to asymptomatic patients will increasethe possibility of diagnosis and prevent delayed diagnosis.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Prognostic value of inflammatory markers determined during diagnosis in patients with sarcoidosis: chronic versus remission
    (Assoc Medica Brasileira, 2021) Bekir, Sumeyye Alparslan; Yalcinsoy, Murat; Gungor, Sinem; Tuncay, Eylem; Akyil, Fatma Tokgoz; Sucu, Pakize; Yavuz, Dilek
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammatory markers determined during admission among patients with sarcoidosis with chronic and remission groups. METHODS: This study was designed as retrospective single-center study. Patients with sarcoidosis without treatment and who had at least two years of follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups as chronic and remission. The primary outcome is to evaluate hematological parameters in remission and chronic sarcoidosis groups. RESULTS: Out of 348 patients with sarcoidosis, 142 patients without treatment and followed up for at least two years were included in this study. Groups had similar demographic features with the predominance of females (80.4 and 77.9%, respectively) and stage I disease (78.6 and 68.6%, respectively). Lymphocyte count [median (IQR) 1.7 (1.3-2.3) 109/L versus 2.1 (1.6-2.4) 109/L, p=0.034] was significantly lower, whereas neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly higher [median (IQR) 2.6 (2.0-3.1) versus 2.0 (1.6-2.8), p=0.006] at admission in the chronic group. No significant difference was determined in inflammatory parameters at admission between groups. CONCLUSION: Lower lymphocyte count and higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were determined in patients with chronic sarcoidosis compared with the remission group, based on monitoring of radiological staging up to five-year after the initial diagnosis. Accordingly, the identification of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio at diagnosis seems to be a potential prognostic marker in patients with sarcoidosis beside its low cost and easy determination in routine clinical practice.