Yazar "Yolcu, U." seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Comparison of a new flap design with the routinely used triangular flap design in third molar surgery(Churchill Livingstone, 2015) Yolcu, U.; Acar, A. H.The aim of this study is to introduce a new flap design in the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars a lingually based triangular flap and to compare this flap design with the routinely used triangular flap. This randomized, prospective, split-mouth study involved 22 patients with impacted bilateral mandibular third molars that were symmetrically positioned, mesially angulated, and retained in bone. The impacted teeth were removed in two sessions, using two different flap designs: the new alternative flap and the traditional triangular flap. Postoperative complications (pain, swelling, trismus, alveolar osteitis, and wound dehiscence) were recorded on days 2, 7, 14, and 21. The data obtained were analysed using the chi(2) test, the Mann Whitney U-test, and Pearson's correlation. In terms of the severity of postoperative facial swelling and trismus, there were no statistically significant differences between the flap designs (P > 0.05). The alternative flap exhibited higher pain scores at 12 h post-surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, the alternative flap group exhibited less wound dehiscence, although this was not statistically significant. Moreover, all wound dehiscence in this group occurred on sound bone. In conclusion, these results show that this new flap design is preferable to the routinely used flap for impacted third molar surgery.Öğe Effects of low-level laser therapy on osteoblastic bone formation and relapse in an experimental rapid maxillary expansion model(Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2015) Aras, M. H.; Erkilic, S.; Demir, T.; Demirkol, M.; Kaplan, D. S.; Yolcu, U.Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on osteoblastic bone formation and relapse during expansion of rat palatal sutures. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two Wistar rats were randomly allocated into two groups of 16 rats each. In the first group, LLLT was applied 4 days after expansion commenced. Seven days after expansion, retainers were applied for 10 days. The second group was similarly treated, with the exception of laser therapy. All rats were sacrificed on day 7 (n = 1) (the end of the expansion period; laser group (LG) 1 [LLLT 1] and control group (CG) 1 [control 1]) and day 17 (n = 8) (the end of the retention period; LG 2 [LLLT 2] and CG 2 [control 2]) for histological assessment. Results: The LLLT 1 group had significantly higher numbers of osteoclasts than did the control 1 group (P = 0.036). No significant between-group difference in osteoblast cell or capillary numbers was evident when day 7 and 17 data were compared. Conclusion: Histologically, LLLT stimulated bone formation, as revealed by analysis after the retention period. LLLT during expansion may accelerate bone healing.Öğe An Evaluation of Effects Of Platelet-rich-fibrin on Postoperative Morbidities after Lower Third Molar Surgery(Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2017) Asutay, F.; Yolcu, U.; Gecor, O.; Acar, A. H.; Ozturk, S. A.; Malkoc, S.Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess whether the use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) decreased the pain, swelling, and trismus levels of postoperative third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: In a double-blinded, split-mouth randomized study, thirty patients (6 male/24 female, mean age 20.32 years) with bilateral symmetric impacted third molars were enrolled in this study to receive surgery. The PRF mass was randomly placed in one of the extraction sockets, whereas the other socket was left without treatment. The outcome variables were pain, maximum mouth opening (trismus), swelling (edema), and the presence of dry socket which were measured using a 10-point visual analog scale, manual calipers, and 3dMD facial imaging system which was used for the 1st time in the third molar surgery. Results: Statistical analyses revealed that there were no significant differences between the control and study groups regarding postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that PRF was not observed to have a positive effect on postoperative discomfort, so even though, PRF is presumed to have positive effects on healing and recovery processes.