Yazar "Yucel, Yusuf" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Removing gallbladder from intra abdominal area by a different technique
    (2017) Gozeneli, Orhan; Tatli, Faik; Uzunkoy, Ali; Yucel, Yusuf
    Aim: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a widely performed technique worldwide. The use of laparoscopic threaded holders for this is routine but takes a lot of time and may tear the gallbladder. There are no wide-mouthed and short endoscopic instruments that can be used for removing the gallbladder without perforation. We look at gallbladder removal methods that are quick and do not involve damage at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 30 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients divided into two equal groups, one employing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) and the other using a sponge holding forceps (SHF) (n=15, both groups) to demonstrate the effectiveness of our management. In the CLC group, the number of male patients was two (13.3 %) and female patients 13 (86.7%); in the SHF group, number of male patients was six (40%) and female patients nine (60%). When we compared the results statistically for bladder removal time, total operation time, gallbladder perforation, and wound infection, the p values were found to be 0.016, 0.182, 0.169, and 1, respectively.Results: Thirty patients were analyzed. The SHF group showed significantly better results than the CLC group for gallbladder removal time and better although not significantly better results for perforation of bladder, while there was no difference between the groups for wound infection.Conclusion: Removing the gallbladder with an SHF significantly shortens the duration of removal and also reduces perforations as compared to CLC.Keywords: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Forceps; Techniques.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis
    (Edizioni Luigi Pozzi, 2016) Tatli, Faik; Ekici, Ugur; Kanlioz, Murat; Gozeneli, Orhan; Uzunkoy, Ali; Yucel, Yusuf; Dirican, Abuzer
    PURPOSE: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical abdominal emergency. In the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis, the fact that there is no a sign which could be a reliable indicator in most of the patients increases the complications. In this study we aimed to search the relation between Ultrasonography(US) findings in patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis and postoperative histopathologic investigation on remoced appendix.. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The files of 174 patients who came in our emergency department with lower right abdominal pain were studied retrospectively from January 2013 to May 2014. Of them, 26 patients were excluded, because these patients were not studied with US. US findings and histopathology reports of 148 patients with suspected acute appendicitis and studies preoperatively with abdominal US were enrolled. Greater than 6-mm diameter of the appendix under compression was accepted as positive sign of appendicitis in US. The demographic characteristics of the patients, US findings (acut appendicitis or not) and the pathology results were recorded on the standard proform. RESULTS: Of these 148 patients, 100 were acute appendicitis in preoperative US, and of these 100 patients, 93 histopathologic reports were acute appendicitis, 7 were normal appendices. The sensitivity of US was 75.6 % and specificity was 72 %. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 93 %, negative predictive value (NPTO was 14.6 % and the accuracy of US value was 81.7%. As a result, although US in diagnosis of acute appendicitis is a reliable technique, negative result doesn't mean no acute appendicitis. In order to determine an accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis clinical and laboratoary findings should be assessed together.