Diagnostic Benefits and Surgical Implications of Methods for Tumor Localization in Sigmoid and Rectum Tumors

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCORBACI, Kadir/0000-0001-7616-4798
dc.authoridAkcicek, Mehmet/0000-0002-0232-1284
dc.authorwosidAkcicek, Mehmet/GLN-7854-2022
dc.contributor.authorGul, Mehmet Onur
dc.contributor.authorAkcicek, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorIflazoglu, Nidal
dc.contributor.authorCorbaci, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Cuma Ali
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorParsak, Cem Kaan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:57:41Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstract(1) Background: In our study, we aimed to determine the accuracy rates of imaging methods for sigmoid, rectosigmoid colon, and rectum cancer. (2) Methods: Patients with tumors located in the rectosigmoid colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum who were operated on were included. Upon admission, we examined the patients' first diagnostic colonoscopies and their preoperative repeat control colonoscopies and computed tomography (CT) report. (3) Results: In this study, 23 patients (57.5%) were male. The overall accuracy rates were 80.0% (32/40) in colonoscopy, 65.0% (26/40) in preoperative CT, and 87.5% (35/40) in retro CT, and the differences among the examination methods were statistically significant (p = 0.049). The sensitivity levels decreased to 50.0% for colonoscopy and preoperative CT and 75.0% for retro CT in rectosigmoid colon tumors. In rectal tumors, the sensitivity levels were 75.0% in colonoscopy, 60.0% in preoperative CT, and 80.0% in retro CT. In two patients, the tumor location was given incorrectly, and postoperative pathological evaluations indicated T3N0 tumors; the initially planned treatment was thus changed to include radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy in the postoperative period because the tumor was located in the middle rectum. (4) Conclusions: Accuracy in tumor localization in sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum tumors still needs to be improved, which could be accomplished with prospective studies. CT evaluations for cancer localization in this patient group should be re-evaluated by a radiologist.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics14131363
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.issue13en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39001253en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131363
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102832
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001269279800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnosticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcolon canceren_US
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectcomputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectrectum canceren_US
dc.subjecttumor localizationen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic Benefits and Surgical Implications of Methods for Tumor Localization in Sigmoid and Rectum Tumorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu