Physical Properties of Different Orthodontic Composites

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAKSAKALLI, Sertaç/0000-0002-1916-8108;
dc.authorwosidAKSAKALLI, Sertaç/HKN-8458-2023
dc.authorwosidMalkoc, Meral Arslan/AAC-5742-2021
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Firat
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Meral Arslan
dc.contributor.authorCorekci, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorAksakalli, Sertac
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T21:00:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T21:00:10Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the water sorption, solubility, and compressive strength of 3 traditional orthodontic composites and 1 flowable composite after 1, 7, and 30 days of immersion in water. Materials and Method: The traditional orthodontic composites used in this study were ORTHO Bracket Paste (Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, USA), Transbond XT (3M, Monrovia, CA, USA), and Light Bond (Reliance, Itasca, IL, USA). The flowable composite used was Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The specimens were subjected to water sorption and solubility tests based on the ISO 4049 and ADA No. 8 requirements. Mechanical tests were performed with an Instron Universal Test Machine. Results: There were no significant differences in solubility among the 4 materials after 1 and 7 days (p > 0.05). Tetric EvoFlow had a lower compressive strength than the traditional orthodontic composites (p > 0.05) and exhibited significantly higher water sorption than the traditional orthodontic composites after immersing them in water for 1, 7, and 30 days (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results revealed that the flowable composite had higher solubility and water absorption but less compressive strength than the traditional orthodontic composite resins used in this study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.13076/TJO-D-14-00007
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.identifier.issn2528-9659
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage28en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.13076/TJO-D-14-00007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/103854
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000439301100004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAves Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCompositeen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticen_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectWateren_US
dc.titlePhysical Properties of Different Orthodontic Compositesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu