Prevalence of Bifid Mandibular Canals in Turkish Eastern Anatolia Population: A Retrospective Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridduman, suayip burak/0000-0003-2552-0187
dc.authoriddedeoğlu, numan/0000-0003-0892-3654
dc.authorwosidduman, suayip burak/ABE-5878-2020
dc.authorwosiddedeoğlu, numan/ABH-2864-2020
dc.contributor.authorDedeoglu, Numan
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Suayip Burak
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T21:00:54Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T21:00:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Mandibular canal is between mandibular foramen and mental foramen and it includes inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. For surgical procedures on mandible such as impacted tooth extraction, dental implant surgery, and sagittal split ramus osteotomy, assesing variations and anatomic location of the mandibular canal is very important. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess bifid mandibular canals by analysing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images in Turkish population of eastern Anatolia region. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in which prevalance of bifid mandibular canal was assessed in 4 groups; group with third molar {group A: impacted (A1) and erupted (A2)} and without third molar {group B: only third molars missing (B1) and posterior edentulous area (B2)} with types and sub-types. Descriptive analysis and chi-square test were used for statistical analyses. Results: Of the 501 CBCT images assessed, bifid mandibular canal was found in 210 (41.9%). No significant difference was found between genders (p>0.05). The frequency of bifid mandibular canal was found as 47.3% in group A (45.8% in group A1 and 48.9% in group A2), and as 35.1% in group B (41.7% in group B1 and 31.2% in group B2). In patients who had third molars, bifid mandibular canal was seen more when compared with those who did not (p<0.05) had. Among bifid mandibular canals, retromolar canals were seen the most. Conclusion: The prevalence of bifid mandibular canal analysed by CBCT was found to be 41.9%. No difference was found between genders in terms of prevalence. CBCT is significantly useful tool before the surgical procedures especially removing third molars.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7860/JCDR/2020/42721.13508
dc.identifier.issn2249-782X
dc.identifier.issn0973-709X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2020/42721.13508
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/103902
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000514202800065en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPremchand Shantidevi Research Foundationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRetromolar canalen_US
dc.subjectThird molaren_US
dc.titlePrevalence of Bifid Mandibular Canals in Turkish Eastern Anatolia Population: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu