A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TACTILE STIMULUS METHODS ON REDUCING PAIN OF CHILDREN DURING INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridZengin, Mürşide/0000-0003-1453-6028
dc.authoridYAYAN, Emriye Hilal/0000-0003-0075-4171
dc.authorwosidZengin, Mürşide/AAC-2663-2021
dc.authorwosidYAYAN, Emriye Hilal/AAB-9526-2020
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Murside
dc.contributor.authorYayan, Emriye Hilal
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:56:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:56:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Pediatric patients in the emergency department often require intramuscular injection procedures, which may lead to pain, fear, and anxiety. The purpose of this study was to test a novel nonpharmacological intervention to reduce needle-related pain in the pediatric emergency department. Methods: The study was conducted as a parallel-group, randomized controlled design. The study population consisted of 159 children aged 7 to 10 years cared for in the emergency department who received an intramuscular injection of ampicillin/sulbactam. The children were randomly assigned to Palm Stimulator, ShotBlocker, or control groups. The children's preprocedure fear levels were evaluated using the Children's Fear Scale, and their perceived pain levels during the procedure were evaluated using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and Visual Analog Scale. Parents and observers also completed the pain level scores. Results: According to all raters (child, parent, and observer), the Palm Stimulator group had the lowest mean Faces Pain Scale-Revised score averages (P < .001). The Visual Analog Scale score averages of the children in the Palm Stimulator group (Visual Analog Scale: M = 27.94, standard deviation = 19.13) were statistically significantly lower than the ShotBlocker (Visual Analog Scale: M = 46.07, standard deviation = 24.96) and control group (Visual Analog Scale: M = 53.43, standard deviation = 29.01) score averages (F = 14.94, eta(2) = 0.16, P= .001). Discussion: The results of this study support the effectiveness of the Palm Stimulator to reduce perceived pain in children during intramuscular injection administration in the pediatric emergency department.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jen.2021.10.006
dc.identifier.endpage180en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-1767
dc.identifier.issn1527-2966
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34952709en_US
dc.identifier.startpage168en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2021.10.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102176
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000819794100009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Emergency Nursingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectIntramuscular injectionen_US
dc.subjectNursing practiceen_US
dc.subjectPain managementen_US
dc.subjectPediatric emergency departmenten_US
dc.titleA COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TACTILE STIMULUS METHODS ON REDUCING PAIN OF CHILDREN DURING INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu