The prognastic efficiencies of modified early warning score and mainzemergency evaluation score for emergency department patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAkgun, F. S.
dc.contributor.authorErtan, C.
dc.contributor.authorYucel, N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T12:04:18Z
dc.date.available2019-07-23T12:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recently, there is an increasing interest for scoring systems to evaluate the critically ill patients by means of the severeness of their disease and their availibility for discharge in the emergency departments and intensive care units. Our aim in this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the mEWS and MEES scoring systems in assessing the severeness of the disease and predicting the mid term prognosis of the patients hospitalized following their emergency care in our emergency room. Material and Method: Patients, who attended to Inonu University Department of Emergency Medicine and hospitalized following their emergency care were included to our study. The effects of age, sex, triage categories, mEWS and MEES scores on the site of hospitalization and mortality was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS for Windows version 16.0. The data was summarized as means, standart deviation and percents. Univariate and multiavriate analyses were performed for risk factor calculations. Results: The mean age of the patients was 5819 and 584 (56%) were male. Triage group 1 patients accounted for 21 of all (2%), while 646 (61%) were in group 2 and 384 (37%) were in triage group 3. Of all patients, 341 (32%) were hospitalized to ICU. While discharged patients accounted for 89% (935 patients) of the study group, 116 patients (11%) died at the hospital. The GCS, AVPU and mEWS values were statistically significant by means of patient mortality (P < 0.0001), but the delta MEES value was not (P < 0.127). Conclusion: The results of our stuy suggests that mEWS evaluation is an effective and reliable tool for predicting outcome and hospitalization areas of ED patients. Our results also displayed that the easily available GCS and AVPU scales are reliable guides in patient management. MEES values, on the other hand, are not convenient for ED use.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAkgun, FS . Ertan, C. Yucel, N . (2018). The prognastic efficiencies of modified early warning score and mainzemergency evaluation score for emergency department patients. Cilt:21. Sayı:12. 1590-1595 ss.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_58_18en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1595en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1590en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/12869
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters kluwer medknow publıcatıons, wolters kluwer ındıa pvt ltd , a-202, 2nd flr, qube, c t s no 1498a-2 vıllage marol, andherı east, mumbaı, 400059, ındıaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNıgerıan journal of clınıcal practıceen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMedıcal patıentsen_US
dc.subjectapache-ııen_US
dc.subjectcareen_US
dc.subjectphysıcıansen_US
dc.subjectmortalıtyen_US
dc.subjectcomaen_US
dc.titleThe prognastic efficiencies of modified early warning score and mainzemergency evaluation score for emergency department patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Tıp Fakültesi Acil Tıp Koleksiyonu