Randomized controlled trial of monopolar cautery versus clips for staple line bleeding control in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

dc.contributor.authorGündoğan, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp, Cüneyt
dc.contributor.authorAktaş, Aydın
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Kutay
dc.contributor.authorSansal, Müfit
dc.contributor.authorUylas, Ufuk
dc.contributor.authorGökler, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Egemen
dc.contributor.authorSümer, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-25T06:18:28Z
dc.date.available2019-07-25T06:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bleeding from the staple line is a rare but serious problem following bariatric surgery. Staple line bleeding control (SLBC) can be achieved in different ways such as the application of sutures, clips, glue or buttressing materials over the staple line. Cauterization alone is generally not preferred due to concerns about debilitating the staple line. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the clip and monopolar cauterization methods for SLBC in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Setting: University hospital. Methods: A total of 70 morbidly obese patients were randomized into two groups. Patients with previous upper gastrointestinal surgery, re-do procedures and open surgeries were excluded. Their demographic characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were examined. Results: A total of 489 SLBC interventions (274 clips and 215 cauterizations) were performed after 280 stapling applications. SLBC intervention number and location, additional trocar requirement, blood loss and operation time were not different between the groups. In the clip group, two patients required monopolar cauterization when clipping failed. No intraabdominal bleeding or gastrointestinal leakage was seen in any group. Postoperative gastrointestinal hemorrhage was seen in three patients, two in the clip group and one in the cautery group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of postoperative pain score, abdominal drainage amount, hemoglobin level alteration, morbidity or length of stay. Conclusions: In laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, monopolar cauterization for SLBC can be used instead of clipping. It appears that monopolar cautery is a safe and effective approach for SLBC in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGündoğan, E. Kayaalp, C. Aktaş, A. Sağlam, K. Sansal, M. Uylas, U. Gökler, C. Çiçek, E. Sümer, F. (2018). Randomized controlled trial of monopolar cautery versus clips for staple line bleeding control in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Cilt:58, 52-56 ss.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.09.007en_US
dc.identifier.endpage56en_US
dc.identifier.startpage52en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/12924
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevıer scıence bv, po box 211, 1000 ae amsterdam, netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternatıonal journal of surgeryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSleeve Gastrectomyen_US
dc.subjectReınforcementen_US
dc.titleRandomized controlled trial of monopolar cautery versus clips for staple line bleeding control in Roux-en-Y gastric bypassen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale Dosyası.pdf
Boyut:
617.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: