Clinical Comparison of Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Allograft or Autograft

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridİnceoğlu, Feyza/0000-0003-1453-0937
dc.authoridAri, Bunyamin/0000-0001-9720-1869
dc.authorwosidİnceoğlu, Feyza/GVK-2847-2022
dc.authorwosidAri, Bunyamin/ADU-8498-2022
dc.contributor.authorAltunkilic, Tarik
dc.contributor.authorAri, Bunyamin
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorInceoglu, Feyza
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:57:26Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:57:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical results of individuals who underwent an autograft or allograft repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis was done on the patient files of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2020 using semitendinosus-gracilis tendon autografts (SGT-A) and tibialis anterior tendon allografts (TAT-A). In this study, the data of 30 patients in each group were included. Knee laxity tests, the Lysholm knee grading system, the Tegner activity score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were used to compare patient results. Results: While there was no significant difference in the Tegner activity score between the preoperative and the final measurement (p=0.241), the IKDC scores and the Lysholm knee ratings changed statistically significantly between the preoperative measurement and the last control visit (p=0.020, and p=0.038, respectively) for both groups in this study. The SGT-A group's Lysholm knee score had a preoperative value of 60.97% and a final control value of 90.48%. The preoperative Lysholm knee score for the TAT-A group was 61.31%, and the final control value was 95.03%. The anterior drawer and Lachman test findings showed statistically significant intergroup (autograft and allograft) alterations in both the autograft and allograft groups (both p<0.001). Conclusion: In terms of knee function and laxity, this study achieved a better clinical outcome in the allograft group compared to the autograft group.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18678/dtfd.1147648
dc.identifier.endpage262en_US
dc.identifier.issn1307-671X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage257en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.1147648
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102601
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001206407600012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDuzce Univ, Fac Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDuzce Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.subjectallograften_US
dc.subjectarthroscopy.en_US
dc.titleClinical Comparison of Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Allograft or Autograften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu