The Bioequivalence Determination of Two Different Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Heifers Following Intramuscular Administration

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYilmaz, Ismet/0000-0001-8680-3098
dc.authoridElmas, Muammer/0000-0001-9059-7151
dc.authorwosidYilmaz, Ismet/H-4144-2019
dc.authorwosidYılmaz, ismet/AAG-8946-2019
dc.authorwosidElmas, Muammer/B-1013-2008
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ismet
dc.contributor.authorElmas, Muammer
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T21:01:19Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T21:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of two medicinal products of enrofloxacin, which have been also marketed as 10% injectable solution in Turkey, after the intramuscular injection (IM) at a single dose of 2.5 mg/kg of BW in the heifers. The present study was performed on healthy 6 Swiss-Brown (12-18 months and 340-400 kg BW) heifers. This study was carried out on the based a single dose cross-over design. Blood samples were taken into sterilized tubes just before, and 10(th), 20(th), 30(th), 45(th), 60(th) and 90(th) min. and 2(th), 3(th), 4(th), 6(th), 8(th), 12(th) and 24(th) h following injections. The plasma concentrations of enrofloxacin (ENR) were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following the extraction process. The plasma concentration-time curves for each animals showed that both products distributed according two-compartment open model. The basic pharmacokinetic parameters at this study were only the AUC(0-24) and AUC(total) were statistically significant (P<0.05) before logarithmic (log) transformation. Log transformed the AUC(0-24), AUC(total) and C(max) parameters and observed t(max) were used in BE evaluation. Minimum, maximum and mean AUC(0-24) AUC(total) and C(max) for A and B products were found in the acceptable ranges (70-143%). For the t(max) value log transformation has not been done and that were determined within the limits 80-125%. As a result; it is concluded that both products could be used instead of each other as an inter-changeable drugs.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage382en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-6045
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage377en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/104290
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000278340800004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKafkas Univ, Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.ispartofKafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBioequivalenceen_US
dc.subjectEnrofloxacinen_US
dc.subjectHeiferen_US
dc.titleThe Bioequivalence Determination of Two Different Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Heifers Following Intramuscular Administrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu