Considerations on Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: A Critical and Hermeneutic Analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUnlusoy, Abdulhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:57:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:57:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThere is a modal version of the ontological argument that Hartshorne defends and deduces the necessary existence of God from the logical possibility of the concept of God. Hartshorne argues that an ontological argument which is based on the classical theism's conception of God encounters some difficulties and the way to overcome these difficulties is possible if there is a distinction between existence and actuality in accordance with a neoclassical conception of God. In this paper, firstly, Hartshorne's modal proof is examined, then it is dis-cussed whether a neo-classical conception based on the existence-actuality dis-tinction overcomes the criticisms of modal ontological proof.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.29288/beytulhikme.65716
dc.identifier.issn1303-8303
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.29288/beytulhikme.65716
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102694
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000907597100001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBeytulhikme Felsefe Cevresien_US
dc.relation.ispartofBeytulhikme-An International Journal of Philosophyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOntological argumenten_US
dc.subjectHartshorneen_US
dc.subjectGoden_US
dc.subjectnecessityen_US
dc.subjectexistenceen_US
dc.subjectactualityen_US
dc.titleConsiderations on Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: A Critical and Hermeneutic Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu