Comparison of ıntracorporeal knot tying suture polyglactin and titanium endoclips in laparoscopic appendiceal stump closure

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid114041en_US
dc.authorid116248en_US
dc.authorid28465en_US
dc.authorid112689en_US
dc.authorid110105en_US
dc.contributor.authorAteş, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDirican, Abuzer
dc.contributor.authorİnce, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorAra, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorIşık, Burak
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Sezai
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-29T11:53:45Z
dc.date.available2017-11-29T11:53:45Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.descriptionSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Volume 22, Number 3, June 2012en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-described surgical technique. However, concerns still exist regarding whether the closure of the appendiceal stump should be done with a clip, an endoloop, staples, or other techniques. Therefore, several modifications to the original technique with new materials have been introduced for appendiceal stump closure. The aim of this study was to compare intracorporeal (polyglactin) knot-tying suture with titanium endoclips in appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: The study was carried out as a prospective randomized clinical trial between April 2010 and February 2011. Patients with a presentation of appendicitis were included into the study. Two groups were defined—patients with the titanium endoclip and patients with the knot-tying (polyglactin) suture. The results in terms of operating time, complication rates, and hospital stay were analyzed. Results: Sixty-one patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were enrolled in the titanium endoclip group (n= 30) or the knot-tying (polyglactin) suture group (n= 31). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of the distribution of age, sex percentage, appendix localization, and histopathologic diagnosis (P> 0.05). One patient required a second operation on postoperative day 10 because of intraperitoneal abscess. The mean operative time for the endoclip group (41.27± 12.2 min) was shorter than that for the knot-tying group (62.81± 15.4 min) (P= 0.001). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of hospital stay, follow-up time, and preoperative and postoperative complications (P> 0.05).en_US
dc.identifier.citationAteş, M., Dirican, A., İnce, V., Ara, C., Işık, B., & Yılmaz, S. (2012). Comparison Of Intracorporeal Knot Tying Suture Polyglactin And Titanium Endoclips İn Laparoscopic Appendiceal Stump Closure. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 22(3), 226–231.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824f25cden_US
dc.identifier.endpage231en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage223en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22678318
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/7846
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniquesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniquesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectAppendectomyen_US
dc.subjectKnot-tyingen_US
dc.subjectEndoclipen_US
dc.titleComparison of ıntracorporeal knot tying suture polyglactin and titanium endoclips in laparoscopic appendiceal stump closureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale Dosyası.pdf
Boyut:
192.83 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı Koleksiyonu