Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials at the womans with pseudoseizure

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridUnal, Suheyla/0000-0003-3266-6256
dc.authoridUnal, Suheyla/0000-0003-3266-6256
dc.authoridozcan, abdulcemal/0000-0002-6759-7556
dc.authorwosidUnal, Suheyla/AAS-2388-2020
dc.authorwosidUnal, Suheyla/JVO-8367-2024
dc.authorwosidUnal, Suheyla/HJH-7559-2023
dc.authorwosidozcan, abdulcemal/B-1348-2008
dc.contributor.authorHan Almis, Behice
dc.contributor.authorElbozan Cumurcu, Birgul
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, A. Cemal
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Suheyla
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T21:02:23Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T21:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to assess vulnerability in the lower brain stem at the patients with the pseudoseizure subtype of conversion disorder by vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) in this study. Methods: In the study, 22 women with the diagnosis of conversion disorder which show convulsions according to SCID-I/CV and 22 healthy women are taken to assessment. After administration of SCID-I/CV by an experienced investigator to the patients and healthy controls, the sociodemographic data form, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale were administered. VEMP evaluation performed at the patients and healthy control groups in a neurology laboratory. Results: P1 latency is no statistically significant difference at the patients with pseudoseizure compared to healthy control groups in the VEMP assessment at the right and left. Similarly, N1 latency values are no statistically significant difference between the patient and control groups. Right and left P1-N1 amplitude values no statistically significant difference at the patients with pseudoseizure compared to control groups values. Discussion: VEMP values no statistically significant difference at the patient compared to control groups at this study which it aimed to assess lower brain stem at the patients with the pseudoseizure subtype of conversion disorder by VEMP. This result is well adjusted hypothesis of increased corticofugal inhibition of afferent stimuli. However If P1-N1 (inhibition component) and N23-P44 (exitation component) components of VEMP waves to being careful, this subject will clear up. This study can plan again at the widely patients groups with deconvolution method and include other subtype of conversion disorder.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/apd.35955
dc.identifier.endpage324en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-6631
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/apd.35955
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/104708
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000329925400004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherCumhuriyet Univ Tip Fak Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalien_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi-Anatolian Journal of Psychiatryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectconversion disorderen_US
dc.subjectpseudoseizureen_US
dc.subjectvestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP)en_US
dc.titleVestibular evoked myogenic potentials at the womans with pseudoseizureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu