Comparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOcak, Mevlüt Sinan/0000-0002-3121-2116
dc.authoridsimsek, neslihan/0000-0003-1142-9016
dc.authoridKeleş, Ali/0000-0003-2835-767X
dc.authoridYologlu, Saim/0000-0002-9619-3462
dc.authorwosidOcak, Mevlüt Sinan/P-4906-2019
dc.authorwosidsimsek, neslihan/ABF-1071-2020
dc.authorwosidKeleş, Ali/J-5897-2015
dc.authorwosidOCAK, Mevlüt Sinan/V-9709-2018
dc.authorwosidYologlu, Saim/ABI-8014-2020
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAhmetoglu, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Mevlut Sinan
dc.contributor.authorYologlu, Saim
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:57:27Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:57:27Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two retreatment techniques, in terms of the operating time and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results, in removing three different root canal sealers from root canals that were previously filled with gutta-percha. Sixty extracted single-rooted human premolars were divided into three groups and filled with iRoot SP, MM Seal, and AH Plus sealers, along with gutta-percha, through a lateral compaction technique. Root canal fillings of the samples were removed by ESI ultrasonic tips or R-Endo files. The time to reach the working length was recorded. Longitudinally sectioned samples were examined under SEM magnification. Each picture was evaluated in terms of the residual debris. Data were statistically analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis test. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of operating time (p>0.05). Significant differences in the number of debris-free dentinal tubules were found among the root canal thirds, but this finding was not influenced by the experimental group (p<0.05). Resin sealer tags were observed inside the dentinal tubules in the MM Seal group. Under the conditions of this study, it may be established that there was no difference among the sealers and retreatment techniques.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu University, Scientific Research Projects Unit [201178]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by Inonu University, Scientific Research Projects Unit (201178).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vo128.0006
dc.identifier.endpage121en_US
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24878672en_US
dc.identifier.startpage115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vo128.0006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102649
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341898100005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira De Pesquisa Odontologicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectRetreatmenten_US
dc.subjectMicroscopyen_US
dc.subjectElectronen_US
dc.subjectScanningen_US
dc.titleComparison of different retreatment techniques and root canal sealers: a scanning electron microscopic studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu