A comparative study of the effect of ultrasound and electrostimulation on wound healing in rats

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖzyazgan, İrfan/0000-0003-2074-4587
dc.authorwosidOzyazgan, Irfan/U-6431-2018
dc.authorwosidÖzyazgan, İrfan/K-9601-2019
dc.contributor.authorTaskan, I
dc.contributor.authorOzyazgan, I
dc.contributor.authorTercan, M
dc.contributor.authorKardas, HY
dc.contributor.authorBalkanli, S
dc.contributor.authorSaraymen, R
dc.contributor.authorZorlu, U
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:56:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:56:16Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractA comparative study has been carried out to investigate the effects of electrical stimulation and ultrasound on wound healing. Eighty-four female rats were divided into four groups depending on the treatment received. The first group was given electrical stimulation of 300 mu A direct current, 30 minutes daily, starting with negative polarity and then changed after 3 days of treatment. Group 2 received sham electrostimulation treatment. The third group received 0.1 W/cm(2) pulsed ultrasound using the moving applicator technique for 5 minuted a day. Group 4 received sham ultrasound treatment. A total of 7 days of treatment was given to all groups. Histopathologic and biochemical analyses on the fourth and seventh days and wound breaking strength on the twenty-fifth day were performed for all groups. By accelerating the inflammatory phase, electrical stimulation had progressed the proliferative phase of wound healing earlier than ultrasound had done. Both electrical stimulation and ultrasound have positive effects on proliferative phases, but electrical stimulation was superior to ultrasound at the maturation phase. There was no difference between the two experimental groups on the mast cell reduction effect. Although ultrasound treatment may seem to be efficient in terms of time, when the effects of electrical stimulation and ultrasound on wound healing with the methods employed in our study are considered, it is concluded that electrical stimulation is a means of treatment superior to ultrasound in wound healing.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage972en_US
dc.identifier.issn0032-1052
dc.identifier.issn1529-4242
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9290665en_US
dc.identifier.startpage966en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102175
dc.identifier.volume100en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1997XW23900020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlastic and Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectrical-Stimulationen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectHigh-Voltageen_US
dc.subjectSkin Woundsen_US
dc.subjectRabbitsen_US
dc.subjectAccelerationen_US
dc.subjectPolarityen_US
dc.subjectUlcersen_US
dc.subjectCellsen_US
dc.subjectPigsen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of the effect of ultrasound and electrostimulation on wound healing in ratsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu