A DISCURSIVE COMPARISON OF 2009 AND 2014 LOCAL ELECTIONS COVERAGE IN THE NATIONAL PRESS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridNİSAN, Prof. Dr. Fatma/0000-0002-5460-4876
dc.authorwosidNİSAN, Prof. Dr. Fatma/ABH-4430-2020
dc.contributor.authorNisan, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:56:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:56:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPolitical parties give at least the same importance to the local elections held for local governors as general elections and political party leaders have been conducting propaganda by holding public meetings throughout the country. Local and national presses during this period develop a discourse by often bringing the news about elections to the agenda. Thus, the press reproduces discourses of political parties in every time. Even though news agencies are expected to follow policy of neutrality on the news about the local elections, certain discourses are again developed through the ideology that has been reflected on the news. The aim of this paper is to point out differences between the discourses developed by national press on the news in two periods of time; local elections in 2009 and 2014. While comparing and contrasting the news on the elections in these two periods, the frequency of appearance of the news about the local elections on the front page of the papers has been observed. The central question of this study is how the news about local elections in 2009 and 2014 have been reflected in the national press with the point of discursive terms and what kinds of differences there have been found on the news. The Method of Critical Discourse Analysis by van Dijk has been used in this study in which a one-month period of each election was observed. The study carries a great importance on the point of that how the news about the local elections period in 2009 and 2014 appeared on the national press and discourses over these two election period are compared. In the study which particularly the newspapers from each political ideology were observed and these newspapers are; Aksam, Birgun, Bugun, Cumhuriyet, Evrensel, Gunes, Hurriyet, Milli Gazete, Milliyet, Sabah, Star, Taraf, Turkiye, Vatan, Yeni Asya, Yeni Safak ve Zaman. According to the findings of the study, the national press has paid great attention to the local elections in both 2009 and 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage324en_US
dc.identifier.issn2458-9071
dc.identifier.issue38en_US
dc.identifier.startpage281en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102185
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000386353400015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherSelcuk Univ, Inst Turkish Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSelcuk Universitesi Turkiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi-Selcuk University Journal of Studies in Turcologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectlocal elections of 2009en_US
dc.subjectlocal elections of 2014en_US
dc.subjectideologyen_US
dc.subjectdiscourseen_US
dc.subjectcritical discourse analysisen_US
dc.titleA DISCURSIVE COMPARISON OF 2009 AND 2014 LOCAL ELECTIONS COVERAGE IN THE NATIONAL PRESSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu