Comparison of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements and Microhybrid Composite

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKuden, Cihan/0000-0002-2663-9828
dc.authoridKUDEN, CIHAN/0000-0002-2663-9828
dc.authorwosidKuden, Cihan/HSG-1110-2023
dc.authorwosidKUDEN, CIHAN/AAK-3284-2020
dc.contributor.authorKarakas, Seda Nur
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, Hacer
dc.contributor.authorKuden, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:57:29Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:57:29Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to compare high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC), giomer and microhybrid composite using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Vickers microhardness. Methods: Three different restorative materials Equia Forte (HVGIC), Beautifil II (giomer) and Solare X (microhybrid composite) were used in this study. A total of 30 samples were prepared, 10 of each of the restorative materials used in our study. Samples were prepared using standard cylindrical Teflon molds with a diameter of 8 mm and a height of 2 mm. The measurements of surface roughness and hardness were performed by using AFM and Vickers microhardness, respectively. The surface roughness was analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test. One-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and LSD test was used for the surface hardness (alpha = 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between the groups according to surface roughness values (p> 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between all groups in terms of surface hardness. Conclusion: Reinforced glass ionomer cements had similar and surface properties than composite resin.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Unit of Inonu University [TDH-2018-1330]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Unit of Inonu University (Project number TDH-2018-1330). The authors do not have any financial interest in the companies whose materials are included in this article.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1232
dc.identifier.endpage138en_US
dc.identifier.issn1693-9697
dc.identifier.issn2355-4800
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1232
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/102668
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000754947100001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniv Indonesia, Fac Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry Indonesiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectatomic force microscopyen_US
dc.subjectcompositeen_US
dc.subjectgiomeren_US
dc.subjectglass ionomeren_US
dc.subjectmicrohardnessen_US
dc.subjectsurface roughnessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements and Microhybrid Compositeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu