Physical properties of different orthodontic cements

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAKSAKALLI, Sertaç/0000-0002-1916-8108
dc.authorwosidMalkoc, Meral Arslan/AAC-5742-2021
dc.authorwosidAKSAKALLI, Sertaç/HKN-8458-2023
dc.contributor.authorAksakalli, Sertac
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Meral Arslan
dc.contributor.authorCorekci, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorMalkoc, Siddik
dc.contributor.authorToy, Ebubekir
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T21:00:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T21:00:10Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. We evaluated the water absorption, solubility, and compressive strength of different cements and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs), namely AdhesorA (R), Ketac (TM) Cem, Ortho Band Paste LC (TM), Glass Ionomer Band Cement, and Transbond (TM) Plus. Our aims were to compare the mechanical and physical properties of the cements widely used in orthodontics and to define the most suitable cements in an oral environment in terms of those characteristics. Materials and methods. To assess compressive strength, the cements were subjected to compression tests done on a universal testing machine. To test water absorption and solubility, the weight changes in cement specimens were determined after immersion in distilled water for 1, 7, and 30 days. Results. Adhesor (R) and Ketac (TM) Cem presented significantly higher solubility values than other cements after water immersion for 1, 7, and 30 days (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Our results revealed that the traditional orthodontic cements have higher water solubility and water absorption values as well as lower compressive strength values than the RMGICs used in this study. Furthermore, Transbond (TM) Plus revealed the highest compressive strength, whereas AdhesorA (R) showed the lowest.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00056-015-0284-6
dc.identifier.endpage337en_US
dc.identifier.issn1434-5293
dc.identifier.issn1615-6714
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26149970en_US
dc.identifier.startpage328en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0284-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/103853
dc.identifier.volume76en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000358203000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUrban & Vogelen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadieen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectCementen_US
dc.subjectSolubilityen_US
dc.subjectCompressive strengthen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.titlePhysical properties of different orthodontic cementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu