Yazar "Sayan, Yekbun Gamze" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 5 / 5
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe The effect of modification of inhaler spacer’s visual user guideline on the correct use of the inhaler spacer(2018) Alataş, Cem; Topal, Erdem; Sayan, Yekbun Gamze; Türker, Kenan; Kutlutürk, Kazım; Kutlutürk, Yeşim; Demirtaş, SemihAbstract: Aim: To determine the effect of modification of visual user guideline of inhaler spacer device on the skill of correct usage. Material and Method: The medical faculty intern students at İnönü University were enrolled in the study. The participants were interviewed face-to-face and requested to fill out questionnaires for modified and non-modified visual user guideline. Result: A total of 172 students were included in the study; 104 (60.5%) of the students were male. The study group included 90 students who were evaluated with the modified visual user guidelines; the other group included 82 students who were evaluated with the non-modified visual user guidelines. 76 (84%) out of 90 participants in the group who was given modified visual user guideline performed the inhaler spacer device technique correctly. In contrast, only 12 (15%) of 82 participants in the group who was given non-modified visual user guideline carried out the inhaler spacer device technique correctly (p=0.001). The most common mistakes made in non-modified visual user guideline group were; taking 5-6 deep and slow breaths; 28 (34.1%), shaking MDI and removing cap; 45 (54.9%), and placing mouthpiece between teeth and lips or placing facemask; 57 (69.5%), respectively. Having compared the both groups for the steps of inhaler spacer device use, the modified visual user guideline group fulfilled all the steps more correctly. Conclusion: The visual user guideline of the inhaler devices in our country are insufficient. We are of the opinion that especially visual improvements on user guideline will increase the correct usage of the device by parents.Öğe The effect of modification of inhaler spacer’s visual user guideline on the correct use of the inhaler spacer(2018) Topal, Erdem; Demirtas, Mehmet Semih; Kutluturk, Yesim; Kutluturk, Kazim; Turker, Kenan; Sayan, Yekbun Gamze; Alatas, CemAim: To determine the effect of modification of visual user guideline of inhaler spacer device on the skill of correct usage. Material and Method: The medical faculty intern students at İnönü University were enrolled in the study. The participants were interviewed face-to-face and requested to fill out questionnaires for modified and non-modified visual user guideline. Result: A total of 172 students were included in the study; 104 (60.5%) of the students were male. The study group included 90 students who were evaluated with the modified visual user guidelines; the other group included 82 students who were evaluated with the non-modified visual user guidelines. 76 (84%) out of 90 participants in the group who was given modified visual user guideline performed the inhaler spacer device technique correctly. In contrast, only 12 (15%) of 82 participants in the group who was given non-modified visual user guideline carried out the inhaler spacer device technique correctly (p=0.001). The most common mistakes made in non-modified visual user guideline group were; taking 5-6 deep and slow breaths; 28 (34.1%), shaking MDI and removing cap; 45 (54.9%), and placing mouthpiece between teeth and lips or placing facemask; 57 (69.5%), respectively. Having compared the both groups for the steps of inhaler spacer device use, the modified visual user guideline group fulfilled all the steps more correctly. Conclusion: The visual user guideline of the inhaler devices in our country are insufficient. We are of the opinion that especially visual improvements on user guideline will increase the correct usage of the device by parents.Öğe The historical factors associated with the true non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity in children(2018) Topal, Erdem; Sayan, Yekbun GamzeAim: To determine the frequency of true NSAIDs hypersensitivity in children and whether there were any parameters in the history to predict NSAIDs hypersensitivity. Material and Methods: Children who applied to outpatient clinic with a history suggesting NSAID hypersensitivity were evaluated by a pediatric allergist. The confirmed NSAID hypersensitivity was found by skin test and/or oral provocation tests. Results: Fifty patients who were admitted with a suspicion of immediate-type reaction to NSAID were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 6 (1-16) years old and 28 (56%) of the patients were male. We performed skin tests with the suspected NSAID in 28 (56%) patients. Of these, 2 had positive results. Provocation tests were performed on 48 patients whose skin tests were negative or skin tests were not available. During the provocation tests, 11 patients (22%) developed reaction. Clinical parameters in history were evaluated by using univariate analysis; the age of child ≥ 6 years old (p=0.006), family history of NSAIDs hypersensitivity (p=0.039), presence of multiple immediate type NSAIDs hypersensitivity in history (p=0.01), emergence of reaction within an hour (p=0.004) were found as significant factors to predicted true NSAID hypersensitivity in history. Conclusions: The diagnosis of immediate type NSAIDs hypersensitivity was not done by clinical history, oral provocation tests should be done for true diagnosis. However, the age of child ≥ 6 years old, family history of NSAIDs hypersensitivity, presence of multiple immediate type NSAIDs hypersensitivity in history, emergence of reaction within an hour in history can predict the true NSAIDs hypersensitivityÖğe The historical factors associated with the true nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity in children(2018) Sayan, Yekbun Gamze; Topal, ErdemAim: To determine the frequency of true NSAIDs hypersensitivity in children and whether there were any parameters in the history to predict NSAIDs hypersensitivity.Material and Methods: Children who applied to outpatient clinic with a history suggesting NSAID hypersensitivity were evaluated by a pediatric allergist. The confirmed NSAID hypersensitivity was found by skin test and/or oral provocation tests.Results: Fifty patients who were admitted with a suspicion of immediate-type reaction to NSAID were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 6 (1-16) years old and 28 (56%) of the patients were male. We performed skin tests with the suspected NSAID in 28 (56%) patients. Of these, 2 had positive results. Provocation tests were performed on 48 patients whose skin tests were negative or skin tests were not available. During the provocation tests, 11 patients (22%) developed reaction. Clinical parameters inhistory were evaluated by using univariate analysis; the age of child ? 6 years old (p=0.006), family history of NSAIDs hypersensitivity (p=0.039), presence of multiple immediate type NSAIDs hypersensitivity in history (p=0.01), emergence of reaction within an hour (p=0.004) were found as significant factors to predicted true NSAID hypersensitivity in history.Conclusions: The diagnosis of immediate type NSAIDs hypersensitivity was not done by clinical history, oral provocation tests should be done for true diagnosis. However, the age of child ? 6 years old, family history of NSAIDs hypersensitivity, presence of multiple immediate type NSAIDs hypersensitivity in history, emergence of reaction within an hour in history can predict the true NSAIDs hypersensitivityÖğe The value of the clinical history for the diagnosis of immediate nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity and safe alternative drugs in children(Ocean Side Publications Inc, 2016) Topal, Erdem; Celiksoy, Mehmet Halil; Catal, Ferhat; Sayan, Yekbun Gamze; Sancak, RecepBackground: Diagnosing hypersensitivity reactions that develop as a result of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) with a history is mostly misleading, and skin tests and/or provocation tests are needed for a definitive diagnosis. Objective: To determine the frequency of actual NSAID hypersensitivity and whether there are any parameters in the history to predict NSAID hypersensitivity. In addition, to determine safe alternative drugs for children who are diagnosed with actual NSAID hypersensitivity. Methods: Children with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity were evaluated by an allergist. Safe alternatives in children with a confirmed NSAID hypersensitivity were found by oral provocation tests. Results: Sixty-four patients who were admitted with a suspicion of immediate-type reaction to NSAIDs were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 6 years old (range, 1-17 years), and 37 of the patients (57.8%) were boys. We performed skin tests for suspected NSAID in 35 patients (54.7%). Of these, two had positive results. Provocation tests were performed with 62 patients whose skin test results were negative or for whom skin tests were not available. During the provocation tests, 16 patients (25.8%) developed reactions. Low- and high-dose acetaminophen, nimesulide, and tolmetin sodium were used to find safe alternative drugs. Two patients developed reactions to high-dose acetaminophen but no reaction to nimesulide and tolmetin sodium. When statistically significant parameters were analyzed in a logistic regression model, the presence of multiple NSAIDs hypersensitivity in the patient history (odds ratio 26.6 [95% confidence interval, 1.47-481.63]; p = 0.026) and the emergence of a reaction within an hour (odds ratio 26.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.73-403.11]; p = 0.019) were found as the independent factors to predicted actual NSAID hypersensitivity. Conclusion: The emergence of a reaction within an hour of taking the drug and the presence of multiple NSAIDs hypersensitivity history increased the possibility of actual NSAID hypersensitivity. Nimesulide, low-dose acetaminophen, and tolmetin sodium could be used as safe alternative drugs in patients with multiple NSAIDs hypersensitivity.