Amalgam, kompozit ve cam iyonomer simanların ısı iletkenlik özelliklerinin incelenmesi
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2012
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı restoratif materyallerin ısı iletim özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmada iki tip amalgam, 3 tip cam
ionomer siman (CİS) ve 3 tip kompozit incelendi. Bu materyaller, üretici talimatlarına göre hazırlanarak standart kalıplara uygulandı.
Her materyale ait 3 örnek hazırlandı. Ölçümler Heat Conduction Unit (P.A. Hilton ltd, England) test cihazı ile yapıldı. Her örnek için
ısı iletim katsayısı Fourier formülü kullanılarak hesaplandı. Katsayılar, Kruskal-Wallis testi ile istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Isı
iletiminde bazı materyaller arasında önemli farklılıklar bulundu (p < 0.05). Amalgamın ısı iletim katsayısı diğer materyallerden daha
büyük bulundu (p < 0.05). Amalgam örnekleri arasında bir fark bulunamadı (p > 0.05). Kompozit örnekleri arasında ve CİS’ler
arasında önemli bir fark bulunamadı (p > 0.05). Bu çalışma, restoratif materyallerin ısı yalıtkanları olarak görev yaptıklarını ve farklı
ısı iletim özelliklerinin onların içeriklerinden kaynaklandığını göstermiştir.
The aim of this study was to examine the thermal conductivity of different restorative materials. Two types of amalgam, three types of glass ionomer cement (GIC)and three types of composite were examined. These materials were prepared in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions and applied to standard moulds. Three samples of each material were prepared. Measurements were taken using a Heat Conduction Unit (P.A. Hilton Ltd. Stockbridge, Hants, UK). The thermal conductivity coefficient was calculated for each sample using the Fourier equation. Coefficients were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Significant differences were found for thermal conductivity between some materials (p < 0.05). The conductivity coefficient of amalgam was found to be higher than those of the other materials (p< 0.05). No significant differences were found between amalgam samples (p> 0.05). No significant differences were found between composite samples and no significant differences were found between GICs (p> 0.05). This study showed that restorative materials functioned as thermal insulators and had different heat-conductive properties that depended on their composition.
The aim of this study was to examine the thermal conductivity of different restorative materials. Two types of amalgam, three types of glass ionomer cement (GIC)and three types of composite were examined. These materials were prepared in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions and applied to standard moulds. Three samples of each material were prepared. Measurements were taken using a Heat Conduction Unit (P.A. Hilton Ltd. Stockbridge, Hants, UK). The thermal conductivity coefficient was calculated for each sample using the Fourier equation. Coefficients were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Significant differences were found for thermal conductivity between some materials (p < 0.05). The conductivity coefficient of amalgam was found to be higher than those of the other materials (p< 0.05). No significant differences were found between amalgam samples (p> 0.05). No significant differences were found between composite samples and no significant differences were found between GICs (p> 0.05). This study showed that restorative materials functioned as thermal insulators and had different heat-conductive properties that depended on their composition.
Açıklama
İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. (2012). Cilt.1, Sayı:2, 25-28 ss.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Amalgam, Cam iyonomer siman, Kompozit, Isı iletimi, Glass ionomer cement, Composite, Heat conductivity
Kaynak
İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
1
Sayı
2
Künye
Keleş, A. Ahmetoğlu, F. Yalçın, M. Şimşek, N. T. Bulut, E.Karagöz, Ş. (2012). Amalgam, kompozit ve cam iyonomer simanların ısı iletkenlik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. Cilt.1, Sayı:2, 25-28 ss.
