Long-term follow-up of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients on long-term oxygen treatment

dc.authoridGulbas, Gazi/0000-0002-9435-8307
dc.authoridKilic, Talat/0000-0001-8125-9062
dc.authoridGunen, Hakan/0000-0001-6631-4457
dc.authorwosidGulbas, Gazi/ABI-5182-2020
dc.authorwosidKilic, Talat/ABI-4457-2020
dc.authorwosidGunen, Hakan/HKV-9202-2023
dc.contributor.authorGulbas, G.
dc.contributor.authorGunen, H.
dc.contributor.authorIn, E.
dc.contributor.authorKilic, T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:35:43Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:35:43Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAims: Few studies exist on influence of long-term oxygen treatment (LTOT) on survival of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This study was designed to determine whether LTOT improves survival or not in severely hypoxaemic COPD patients. Materials: COPD patients prescribed oxygen concentrator were consecutively included. Patients' baseline characteristics were noted. During follow-up, patients were divided into three groups according to LTOT utilisation: (i) non-utilisers, (ii) intermittent utilisers (< 15 h/day) and (iii) true utilisers (15 h/day). Patients' status (live or death) and, if died, the date of death were checked throughout the study. The factors which might influence mortality during 5-year period were analysed. Results: Two-hundred and twenty-eight patients completed the study. Of these patients, 55 were in Group 1, 112 were in Group 2 and 61 were in Group 3. Regarding the initial characteristics, there was not any significant difference between groups. Mean follow-up for whole group was 27.8 +/- 18.5 months. Median survivals were similar between groups (19.5 +/- 5.6, 32.5 +/- 4.1 and 30.0 +/- 5.7 months respectively) (p > 0.05). Compared with Group 1, survival was improved in Group 2 (p < 0.05) and there was a positive trend for Group 3 during first 2-year period. However, this improvement disappeared during further follow-up. Analysis of multiple factors which might influence mortality during 5-year period did not yield statistically significant parameter. Discussion and conclusion: We found that, regarding survival, any kind of LTOT proved to be beneficial over no LTOT only in the first 2 years of follow-up, and that there was not any difference between intermittent and true LTOT utilisation.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02833.x
dc.identifier.endpage157en_US
dc.identifier.issn1368-5031
dc.identifier.issn1742-1241
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22188416en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84856090400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage152en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02833.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/95549
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000299251000010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTherapyen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectPredictorsen_US
dc.titleLong-term follow-up of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients on long-term oxygen treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar