Common bile duct diameters after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with common bile duct stones: ultrasonographic evaluation
dc.authorid | Hilmioğlu, Fatih/0000-0002-6440-5686 | |
dc.authorid | Karincaoglu, Melih/0000-0002-9727-5128 | |
dc.authorwosid | Hilmioğlu, Fatih/AAJ-4437-2021 | |
dc.authorwosid | Seckin, Yuksel/ABI-3468-2020 | |
dc.contributor.author | Karincaoglu, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Yildirim, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Seckin, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Kantarceken, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Aladag, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Hilmioglu, F | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-04T20:13:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-04T20:13:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.department | İnönü Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: One of the most reliable, frequently used imaging techniques in cholestasis is ultrasonography (US) for the diagnosis of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Methods: In this study, changes in diameters of CBD were determined ultrasonographically before and after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in 46 patients with stone-induced dilated CBD. Results: There was a significant decrease in CBD diameter measured 1 week after ES and extraction of stone (p < 0.001). In 87% of cases, the difference was more significantly pronounced during the first 24 h of ES. The mean CBD diameters on US were 13.70 +/- 3.00 mm. (10-21 mm) before and 9.13 +/- 2.90 mm (4.2-18 mm) 24 h after endoscopic treatment (p < 0.001). After ES, six patients (13%) with inadequate decreases in CBD diameters were found to have residual stones. Conclusion: US can show residual stones in the CBD with the same efficacy as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00261-002-0068-5 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 535 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0942-8925 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 14580097 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0038681690 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 531 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-002-0068-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11616/93566 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000183890000012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Abdominal Imaging | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | common bile duct diameter | en_US |
dc.subject | stone | en_US |
dc.subject | residual stone | en_US |
dc.subject | ultrasonography | en_US |
dc.subject | endoscopic sphincterotomy | en_US |
dc.title | Common bile duct diameters after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with common bile duct stones: ultrasonographic evaluation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |