Histopathological findings of gastric specimens of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57193764571
dc.authorscopusid36713605800
dc.authorscopusid57202848379
dc.authorscopusid56429441400
dc.authorscopusid26031949600
dc.authorscopusid57217650998
dc.authorscopusid35565697700
dc.contributor.authorUylas U.
dc.contributor.authorGundogdu R.
dc.contributor.authorÇi?Çek E.
dc.contributor.authorŞansal M.
dc.contributor.authorAktas A.
dc.contributor.authorSumer F.
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:02:18Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:02:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractSleeve gastrectomy is the most preferred surgical procedure in obese patients. In the literature, the necessity of pathological examination of the specimen is emphasized because of malignant case reports. In this study, we aimed to present the histopathological findings of the specimens of our patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy due to obesity in the light of the literature. Patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy due to obesity between 2014-2019 in our clinic were retrospectively screened. Endoscopy was not performed in patients with no symptoms. After the obesity committee, the patients were operated and the specimens were sent for routine histopathological examination. Patients' age, gender, body mass index, surgical procedure information, and histopathological features of resected gastric specimens were analyzed. A total of 411 patients were included in the study and there were 309 (75.2%) female patients. The overall mean age was 35 ± 10.3 and the mean body mass index was 44.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2. The pathology of 85 (20.7%) of the patients were reported as completely normal. Abnormal pathological findings were detected in 326 (79.3%) patients. No malignant finding was found in the specimen pathology results. The necessity of endoscopic examination before sleeve gastrectomy is controversial. Even if no malignant pathological result was detected in our study, we believe that routine pathological examination is required for medicolegal reasons. © 2021 Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.52142/omujecm.38.3.22
dc.identifier.endpage325en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-4483
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105349477en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.38.3.22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91585
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOndokuz Mayis Universitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdenocarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal stromal tumoren_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectSleeve gastrectomyen_US
dc.subjectStomachen_US
dc.titleHistopathological findings of gastric specimens of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu