Evaluation of All-on-Four Concept and Alternative Designs with 3D Finite Element Analysis Method

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridPolat, Serkan/0000-0002-5814-5451
dc.authoridGÜL AYGÜN, Esma Başak/0000-0002-9475-4035
dc.authorwosidPolat, Serkan/JAC-3478-2023
dc.authorwosidPolat, Serkan/M-2502-2013
dc.authorwosidGÜL AYGÜN, Esma Başak/U-9647-2018
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Derya Ozdemir
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Nilufer Tulin
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorSeker, Emre
dc.contributor.authorGul, Esma Basak
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:40:00Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:40:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the forces on the implant and supporting alveolar ridge in all on four concept and alternative designs using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Different treatment alternatives with various implant designs were performed in an edentulous mandible. In Design 1, implants were placed according to All-on-Four concept; Design 2, two long (13 mm long, 4 mm diameter) and two short (7 mm long, 4 mm diameter) implants; Design 3, four long and two short implants; and Design 4, two long and four short implants were placed vertically. A force of 100 N for each tooth, a total of 300 N load was applied. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate and compare the different designs. Results: The stress concentration within the cortical bone was significantly higher than the trabecular bone around the neck of the implants. The maximum stress values were located around the cortical bone of the distal implant for all designs. The reduction in the number of implants did not diminish the success of the design. Conclusions: In the presence of vertically resorbed posterior mandibula, although the all on four concept is a feasible approach clinically, short implants had decreased the amount of force transmitted to the supporting bone.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCumhuriyet University, Scientific Research Projects Commission Presidencyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThree-dimensional FEA was carried out by Ay Tasarim Ltd. This study was supported by Cumhuriyet University, Scientific Research Projects Commission Presidency.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.12024
dc.identifier.endpage510en_US
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23217013en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84920589414en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage501en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/96651
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341128300004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAll-on-Four concepten_US
dc.subjectdental implant-abutment designen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectshort implanten_US
dc.subjecttilted implanten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of All-on-Four Concept and Alternative Designs with 3D Finite Element Analysis Methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu